Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-15

← Zeenat Fatima

Pedagogy reviews

poor 2026-10-12 3 days ago 11/13 (85%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

80929756 watch 80948578 watch 80950313 watch 80929632 watch 80927918 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 15 criteria

  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
42 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greeting us
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • text alignment
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-01-16 3y 9m ago 13/14 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26658411 watch 26658438 watch 26717142 watch 26686983 watch 26686553 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
35 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • simple question
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • step understand us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-01-12 3y 9m ago 12/14 (86%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26608708 watch 26611231 watch 26582822 watch 26611151 watch 26613908 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • profile pic
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
35 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • simple question
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • step understand us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-01-08 3y 9m ago 13/14 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26476211 watch 26492970 watch 26520170 watch 26476142 watch 26503053 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
35 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • end concept understanding
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • simple question
  • step understand
  • step understand us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-11-30 3y 10m ago 12/15 (80%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

24923190 watch 25306471 watch 25266243 watch 25272202 watch 25266403 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • profile pic
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-11-20 3y 11m ago 12/13 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

24896123 watch 24803177 watch 24885137 watch 24879945 watch 24895834 watch 24880694 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
22 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-11-15 3y 11m ago 12/13 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

24643564 watch 24673461 watch 24651031 watch 24620162 watch 24613693 watch 24641829 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
22 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-11-09 3y 11m ago 12/13 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

24380716 watch 24389986 watch 24326788 watch 24390622 watch 24354415 watch 24385087 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
22 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-09-27 4 years ago 11/12 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

22336720 watch 22334021 watch 22363900 watch 22361097 watch 22354920 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 7 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
23 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-09-23 4 years ago 12/15 (80%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

22117666 watch 22049749 watch 22020235 watch 22113344 watch 22050481 watch 22110007 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • profile pic
  • solution provided 0/1

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-09-15 4y 1m ago 14/15 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

21279610 watch 21338128 watch 21481999 watch 21532903 watch 21481022 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-09-07 4y 1m ago 14/15 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20948553 watch 21025057 watch 20994705 watch 21014730 watch 21027232 watch

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-08-30 4y 1m ago 12/13 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20616253 watch 20563886 watch 20616711 watch 20617529 watch 20569264 watch 20616454 watch

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
22 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-24 4y 1m ago 12/15 (80%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20180008 watch 19972878 watch 20033304 watch 20180482 watch 20030567 watch 20179881 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • asking to rate 0/1
  • closure 0/1

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-19 4y 1m ago 20/23 (87%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19957429 watch 19935403 watch 19875366 watch 19937138 watch 19877118 watch 19873544 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 16 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
12 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-12 4y 2m ago 19/24 (79%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19470773 watch 19470152 watch 19535555 watch 19596185 watch 19538399 watch 19535425 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • greetings 0/2
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements