Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-10

← Aditya K. Shresth

Pedagogy reviews

good 2026-09-24 16 days ago 9/9 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

80060052 watch 80006077 watch 79993562 watch 80005321 watch 80008147 watch

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • concept explain 1/1
  • concept identify 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • solution simple question 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check concept 1/1
41 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-02-08 3y 8m ago 18/23 (78%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

27240768 watch 27254967 watch 27290903 watch 27255138 watch 27291366 watch 27254811 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • long pauses 0/2
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 14 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • table setup 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
40 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-09-23 4 years ago 12/14 (86%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

22085696 watch 22089907 watch 22090089 watch 22086647 watch 22085435 watch 21736852 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • profile pic
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
21 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements