Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-10

← Saniya Kumari

Pedagogy reviews

good 2026-10-03 7 days ago 10/10 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

80430292 watch 80402502 watch 80366594 watch 80433245 watch 80485823 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • push student 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • concept explain 1/1
  • concept identify 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • solution simple question 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check concept 1/1
39 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2026-09-29 11 days ago 4/5 (80%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

80242273 watch 80239053 watch 80295060 watch 80226194 watch 80231750 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic us 0/1

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
48 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2026-09-25 15 days ago 7/8 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

80093517 watch 80039521 watch 80034391 watch 80033624 watch 80047375 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • profile pic us 0/1
  • understanding check concept 0/1

satisfactory 14 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • concept identify 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
43 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2026-09-23 17 days ago 4/8 (50%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

79998136 watch 80005194 watch 80013225 watch 80001816 watch 80005672 watch

poor 5 criteria

  • final solution 0/1
  • greeting us 0/1
  • profile pic us 0/1
  • session intro delay us 0/1
  • student addressal us 0/1

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
45 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • usage on visual elements