Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-17

← Sanjeet

Pedagogy reviews

good 2026-09-14 1 month ago 7/7 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

79489909 watch 79489183 watch 79552438 watch 79475438 watch 79552900 watch

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • concept explain 1/1
  • concept identify 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • push student 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check concept 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
41 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2023-01-22 3y 8m ago 15/17 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26607743 watch 26867732 watch 26867383 watch 26868930 watch 26826477 watch

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
46 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • student addressal us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-01-11 3y 9m ago 15/17 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26557979 watch 26558376 watch 26558692 watch 26584193 watch 26557233 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • handwriting 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
32 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • simple question
  • solution simple question
  • step understand us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-12-25 3y 9m ago 14/14 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26090220 watch 26103415 watch 26134251 watch 26078881 watch 26054150 watch 26136715 watch

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
21 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-12-18 3y 10m ago 13/14 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

25932905 watch 25896125 watch 25901970 watch 25935760 watch 25902242 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • handwriting 0/1

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • problem breakdown 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
21 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-12-06 3y 10m ago 13/15 (87%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

25478145 watch 25516069 watch 25514019 watch 25526789 watch 25517255 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • handwriting 0/1
  • profile pic

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-12-02 3y 10m ago 16/17 (94%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

25361996 watch 25324548 watch 25363652 watch 25349863 watch 25362999 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 12 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
18 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-11-25 3y 10m ago 14/15 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

25086744 watch 25087594 watch 25084931 watch 25089648 watch 25080050 watch 25038395 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-09 4y 2m ago 12/15 (80%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19446213 watch 19427512 watch 19422224 watch 19428044 watch 19422931 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • greetings 0/2

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements