Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-09

← Pawan Kumar

Pedagogy reviews

poor 2023-06-04 3y 4m ago 23/26 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

29300892 watch 29303185 watch 29301019 watch 29301506 watch 29303937 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
37 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

good 2023-03-06 3y 7m ago 22/24 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

27992677 watch 27991381 watch 27991454 watch 27992802 watch 27992085 watch 27994639 watch

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
39 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-12-14 3y 10m ago 23/24 (96%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

17533345 watch 25773203 watch 25668019 watch 25483530 watch 17289702 watch 17536171 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-06-28 4y 3m ago 11/12 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

17082305 watch 17196152 watch 17091188 watch 17197289 watch 17089822 watch

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
21 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-06-21 4y 3m ago 10/13 (77%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

16843862 watch 16887668 watch 16888796 watch 16887261 watch 16886105 watch 16276088 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • solution provided 0/1

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-24 4y 6m ago 21/24 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11567537 watch 11567839 watch 11570597 watch 11567186 watch 12209642 watch 12533861 watch 11568413 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-02-28 4y 7m ago 21/23 (91%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11404958 watch 11350980 watch 11353083 watch 11342385 watch 11340339 watch 11349190 watch

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-02-22 4y 7m ago 21/23 (91%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11200382 watch 11190180 watch 10972163 watch 11169260 watch 11104857 watch 11189411 watch 11199776 watch

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-02-16 4y 7m ago 23/25 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

10829776 watch 10820865 watch 10781238 watch 10600266 watch 10823421 watch 10794023 watch 10823024 watch

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
  • problem establishment 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-02-15 4y 7m ago 20/23 (87%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

10746874 watch 10749904 watch 10747500 watch 10685338 watch 10763218 watch 10762541 watch 10532923 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • closure 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-02-09 4y 8m ago 18/25 (72%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

10195011 watch 10382928 watch 10384859 watch 10376153 watch 10370550 watch 10366243 watch 10373157 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • background noise 0/1
  • greetings 0/2
  • lighting 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • proficiency
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements