Pedagogy reviews
good 2026-09-29 11 days ago 14/14 (100%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
80298597 watch 80303111 watch 80301859 watch 80310449 watch 80228829 watch
satisfactory 24 criteria
- background noise us 1/1
- camera stability 1/1
- component on whiteboard 1/1
- concept explain 1/1
- concept identify 1/1
- confirm problem 1/1
- greet energy us 1/1
- greeting us 1/1
- handwriting us 1/1
- lighting 1/1
- long pauses us 1/1
- need identification 1/1
- paper division 1/1
- paper quality 1/1
- pen 1/1
- profile pic us 1/1
- session intro delay us 1/1
- shadowing 1/1
- student addressal us 1/1
- table setup 1/1
- text alignment us 1/1
- understanding check 1/1
- understanding check concept 1/1
- understanding check step 1/1
35 criteria not applicable
- asking to rate
- asking to rate us
- background noise
- camera angle
- closure
- courteousness
- explain again
- final solution
- fluency
- greenboard
- greet energy
- greetings
- handwriting
- input devices us
- long pauses
- misconduct
- misconduct us
- motivational conversation
- open conversations
- open conversations us
- opens camera
- physical whiteboard
- problem breakdown
- problem establishment
- profile pic
- push student
- roadmap
- session engagement
- session intro delay
- solution provided
- solution simple question
- step understand
- student addressal
- text alignment
- usage on visual elements
poor 2026-09-15 25 days ago 12/15 (80%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
79599651 watch 79631744 watch 79631791 watch 79632055 watch 79597388 watch
poor 3 criteria
- asking to rate us 0/1
- camera stability 0/1
- table setup 0/1
satisfactory 16 criteria
- background noise us 1/1
- component on whiteboard 1/1
- final solution 1/1
- greet energy us 1/1
- greeting us 1/1
- handwriting us 1/1
- lighting 1/1
- long pauses us 1/1
- paper division 1/1
- paper quality 1/1
- pen 1/1
- profile pic us 1/1
- session intro delay us 1/1
- shadowing 1/1
- student addressal us 1/1
- text alignment us 1/1
40 criteria not applicable
- asking to rate
- background noise
- camera angle
- closure
- concept explain
- concept identify
- confirm problem
- courteousness
- explain again
- fluency
- greenboard
- greet energy
- greetings
- handwriting
- input devices us
- long pauses
- misconduct
- misconduct us
- motivational conversation
- need identification
- open conversations
- open conversations us
- opens camera
- physical whiteboard
- problem breakdown
- problem establishment
- profile pic
- push student
- roadmap
- session engagement
- session intro delay
- solution provided
- solution simple question
- step understand
- student addressal
- text alignment
- understanding check
- understanding check concept
- understanding check step
- usage on visual elements
poor 2026-09-13 27 days ago 12/17 (71%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
79561559 watch 79525756 watch 79562157 watch 79559405 watch 79457006 watch
poor 5 criteria
- asking to rate us 0/1
- camera stability 0/1
- greeting us 0/1
- long pauses us 0/1
- table setup 0/1
satisfactory 18 criteria
- background noise us 1/1
- component on whiteboard 1/1
- confirm problem 1/1
- final solution 1/1
- greet energy us 1/1
- handwriting us 1/1
- lighting 1/1
- paper division 1/1
- paper quality 1/1
- pen 1/1
- profile pic us 1/1
- session intro delay us 1/1
- shadowing 1/1
- solution simple question 1/1
- student addressal us 1/1
- text alignment us 1/1
- understanding check 1/1
- understanding check step 1/1
36 criteria not applicable
- asking to rate
- background noise
- camera angle
- closure
- concept explain
- concept identify
- courteousness
- explain again
- fluency
- greenboard
- greet energy
- greetings
- handwriting
- input devices us
- long pauses
- misconduct
- misconduct us
- motivational conversation
- need identification
- open conversations
- open conversations us
- opens camera
- physical whiteboard
- problem breakdown
- problem establishment
- profile pic
- push student
- roadmap
- session engagement
- session intro delay
- solution provided
- step understand
- student addressal
- text alignment
- understanding check concept
- usage on visual elements
poor 2026-09-09 1 month ago 9/14 (64%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
79404243 watch 79398571 watch 79397455 watch 79406975 watch 79360067 watch
poor 5 criteria
- camera stability 0/1
- final solution 0/1
- long pauses us 0/1
- student addressal us 0/1
- table setup 0/1
satisfactory 15 criteria
- background noise us 1/1
- component on whiteboard 1/1
- confirm problem 1/1
- greet energy us 1/1
- greeting us 1/1
- handwriting us 1/1
- lighting 1/1
- paper division 1/1
- paper quality 1/1
- pen 1/1
- profile pic us 1/1
- session intro delay us 1/1
- shadowing 1/1
- text alignment us 1/1
- understanding check step 1/1
39 criteria not applicable
- asking to rate
- asking to rate us
- background noise
- camera angle
- closure
- concept explain
- concept identify
- courteousness
- explain again
- fluency
- greenboard
- greet energy
- greetings
- handwriting
- input devices us
- long pauses
- misconduct
- misconduct us
- motivational conversation
- need identification
- open conversations
- open conversations us
- opens camera
- physical whiteboard
- problem breakdown
- problem establishment
- profile pic
- push student
- roadmap
- session engagement
- session intro delay
- solution provided
- solution simple question
- step understand
- student addressal
- text alignment
- understanding check
- understanding check concept
- usage on visual elements