Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-10

← Shubham Chaudhary

Pedagogy reviews

good 2026-10-07 2 days ago 7/7 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

80629669 watch 80629569 watch 80629521 watch 80699984 watch 80591740 watch

satisfactory 13 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
46 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

good 2026-09-14 25 days ago 15/15 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

79591830 watch 79591789 watch 79617840 watch 79602226 watch 79591450 watch

satisfactory 21 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
38 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2026-09-10 29 days ago 12/14 (86%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

79453044 watch 79451911 watch 79449605 watch 79397895 watch 79452069 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • long pauses us 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
39 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2026-09-08 1 month ago 8/13 (62%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

79360105 watch 79358882 watch 79353599 watch 79364631 watch 79379613 watch

poor 5 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • greeting us 0/1
  • handwriting us 0/1
  • long pauses us 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 14 criteria

  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
40 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • text alignment
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • usage on visual elements