Pedagogy reviews
poor 2026-09-27 12 days ago 4/7 (57%) · tutor said understood
Sessions reviewed
80166814 watch 80194158 watch 80192650 watch 80192252 watch 80113224 watch
poor 3 criteria
- handwriting us 0/1
- student addressal us 0/1
- text alignment us 0/1
satisfactory 9 criteria
- asking to rate us 1/1
- background noise us 1/1
- component on whiteboard 1/1
- confirm problem 1/1
- greet energy us 1/1
- greeting us 1/1
- long pauses us 1/1
- profile pic us 1/1
- session intro delay us 1/1
47 criteria not applicable
- asking to rate
- background noise
- camera angle
- camera stability
- closure
- concept explain
- concept identify
- courteousness
- explain again
- final solution
- fluency
- greenboard
- greet energy
- greetings
- handwriting
- input devices us
- lighting
- long pauses
- misconduct
- misconduct us
- motivational conversation
- need identification
- open conversations
- open conversations us
- opens camera
- paper division
- paper quality
- pen
- physical whiteboard
- problem breakdown
- problem establishment
- profile pic
- push student
- roadmap
- session engagement
- session intro delay
- shadowing
- solution provided
- solution simple question
- step understand
- student addressal
- table setup
- text alignment
- understanding check
- understanding check concept
- understanding check step
- usage on visual elements