Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-11

← Puppala Bhushan

Pedagogy reviews

poor 2023-04-10 3y 6m ago 13/16 (81%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

28566850 watch 28567000 watch 28565785 watch 28565937 watch 28572081 watch 28572640 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic 0/1

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
47 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-04-02 3y 6m ago 14/17 (82%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

28301763 watch 28462451 watch 28475720 watch 28462475 watch 28462375 watch 28472778 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic 0/1

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
46 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • shadowing
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

good 2023-03-20 3y 6m ago 18/20 (90%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

28253173 watch 28203057 watch 28152196 watch 28133536 watch 28152017 watch 28133388 watch

satisfactory 14 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • problem breakdown 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
43 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • shadowing
  • solution simple question
  • student addressal us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-03-12 3y 7m ago 12/17 (71%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

28119385 watch 28118057 watch 28119659 watch 28118755 watch 28125952 watch 28128273 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • profile pic 0/1
  • solution provided 0/1

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
46 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • session intro delay us
  • shadowing
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-12-14 3y 10m ago 21/23 (91%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

23694483 watch 24503890 watch 24604552 watch 22323928 watch 25708915 watch 24307525 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • paper quality 0/1
  • profile pic

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
12 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-09-11 4y 1m ago 15/16 (94%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

21264022 watch 21069660 watch 20968953 watch 21220855 watch 20916345 watch 20952925 watch

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
19 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-09-04 4y 1m ago 20/26 (77%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20842260 watch 20867660 watch 20861501 watch 20797418 watch 20845326 watch 20881622 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • greetings 0/2
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements