Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-11

← Dheeraj Kumar

Pedagogy reviews

good 2022-08-03 4y 2m ago 23/24 (96%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19052224 watch 19122756 watch 19143180 watch 19164154 watch 19124190 watch 19058362 watch

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-07-26 4y 2m ago 10/11 (91%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

18702086 watch 18614882 watch 18721794 watch 18698298 watch 18711814 watch 18732586 watch

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
22 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-07-20 4y 2m ago 18/22 (82%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

18404243 watch 18360811 watch 18369297 watch 18403930 watch 18386046 watch 18404523 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • long pauses 0/2
  • paper division 0/1

satisfactory 16 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-07-13 4y 3m ago 19/21 (90%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

16533651 watch 17721398 watch 17930287 watch 17992750 watch 17972661 watch 17986729 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
12 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-05-06 4y 5m ago 12/13 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14772117 watch 14821229 watch 14820664 watch 14761180 watch 14820856 watch 14820966 watch

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
18 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-05-01 4y 5m ago 20/22 (91%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14721530 watch 14313516 watch 14713041 watch 14306680 watch 14700514 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-10 4y 7m ago 17/22 (77%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11846612 watch 11807407 watch 11786209 watch 11758037 watch 11745723 watch 11864761 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • camera angle 0/1
  • camera stability 0/1
  • session intro delay 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 13 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
  • problem establishment 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • long pauses
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • session engagement
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-03 4y 7m ago 16/21 (76%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11577413 watch 11349635 watch 11058156 watch 11104102 watch 11576422 watch 11663135 watch 11664166 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • closure 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 12 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
  • problem establishment 2/2
12 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • usage on visual elements