Pedagogy reviews

poor 2026-10-07 3 days ago 15/16 (94%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

80601583 watch 80551222 watch 80520953 watch 80475505 watch 80417084 watch

poor 1 criteria

table setup 0/1

satisfactory 24 criteria

asking to rate us 1/1
background noise us 1/1
camera stability 1/1
component on whiteboard 1/1
concept identify 1/1
confirm problem 1/1
final solution 1/1
greet energy us 1/1
greeting us 1/1
handwriting us 1/1
lighting 1/1
long pauses us 1/1
need identification 1/1
paper division 1/1
paper quality 1/1
pen 1/1
profile pic us 1/1
session intro delay us 1/1
shadowing 1/1
student addressal us 1/1
text alignment us 1/1
understanding check 1/1
understanding check concept 1/1
understanding check step 1/1

34 criteria not applicable

poor 2022-02-28 4y 7m ago 22/25 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11236012 watch 11265983 watch 11325160 watch 11277227 watch 11325342 watch 11537273 watch

poor 2 criteria

closure 0/1
fluency

satisfactory 18 criteria

asking to rate 1/1
camera angle 1/1
camera stability 1/1
greenboard 1/1
handwriting 1/1
lighting 1/1
long pauses 1/2
misconduct 1/1
open conversations 1/2
paper division 1/1
paper quality 1/1
pen 1/1
session intro delay 1/1
shadowing 1/1
solution provided 1/1
student addressal 1/1
table setup 1/1
text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

greetings 2/2
problem establishment 2/2

7 criteria not applicable

background noise
courteousness
motivational conversation
opens camera
physical whiteboard
session engagement
usage on visual elements

good 2022-02-22 4y 7m ago 17/19 (89%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11179569 watch 11101384 watch 11144687 watch 10861981 watch 10723791 watch 11092751 watch

satisfactory 15 criteria

asking to rate 1/1
camera angle 1/1
camera stability 1/1
closure 1/1
greenboard 1/1
long pauses 1/2
misconduct 1/1
open conversations 1/2
pen 1/1
session intro delay 1/1
shadowing 1/1
solution provided 1/1
student addressal 1/1
table setup 1/1
text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

greetings 2/2

13 criteria not applicable

background noise
courteousness
fluency
handwriting
lighting
motivational conversation
opens camera
paper division
paper quality
physical whiteboard
problem establishment
session engagement
usage on visual elements

poor 2022-02-14 4y 7m ago 19/23 (83%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

10679721 watch 9237863 watch 10423340 watch 10547841 watch 10697536 watch 9507284 watch

poor 2 criteria

closure 0/1
student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

asking to rate 1/1
camera angle 1/1
camera stability 1/1
greenboard 1/1
handwriting 1/1
lighting 1/1
long pauses 1/2
misconduct 1/1
open conversations 1/2
paper division 1/1
paper quality 1/1
pen 1/1
session intro delay 1/1
shadowing 1/1
solution provided 1/1
table setup 1/1
text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

greetings 2/2

9 criteria not applicable

background noise
courteousness
fluency
motivational conversation
opens camera
physical whiteboard
problem establishment
session engagement
usage on visual elements