Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-14

← Gaurav Tiwari

Pedagogy reviews

poor 2026-09-25 19 days ago 13/16 (81%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

79687164 watch 79779502 watch 79778947 watch 79912175 watch 79829464 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • greeting us 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 23 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • concept identify 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • push student 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution simple question 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check concept 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
33 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-07-13 4y 3m ago 22/23 (96%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

17844835 watch 17847060 watch 17844244 watch 17846210 watch 17572548 watch

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-06-30 4y 3m ago 22/24 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

17349659 watch 17351129 watch 17357661 watch 17296071 watch 17357962 watch 17356285 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 21 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-06-12 4y 4m ago 23/24 (96%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

16491245 watch 16492567 watch 16499920 watch 16500054 watch 16504939 watch 16499006 watch

satisfactory 22 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-06-03 4y 4m ago 13/14 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

16075701 watch 15920489 watch 15940563 watch 16053885 watch 15987029 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • step understand

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
18 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-05-29 4y 4m ago 22/23 (96%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15898693 watch 15893349 watch 15898105 watch 15875348 watch 15896985 watch 15897202 watch 15884180 watch

satisfactory 21 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-05-19 4y 4m ago 23/24 (96%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15427980 watch 15416674 watch 15417391 watch 15418213 watch 15469361 watch 15465525 watch

satisfactory 21 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • greet energy
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-05-13 4y 5m ago 22/24 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15199235 watch 15204465 watch 15199599 watch 15199422 watch 15195096 watch 15196045 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
7 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-05-09 4y 5m ago 21/24 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15035031 watch 15036104 watch 15033381 watch 15036427 watch 15034679 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • physical whiteboard 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • greet energy
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-05-05 4y 5m ago 21/25 (84%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14874884 watch 14761062 watch 14873345 watch 14760841 watch 14871289 watch 14765513 watch 14869826 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • physical whiteboard 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
6 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-04-24 4y 5m ago 24/25 (96%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14411547 watch 14387847 watch 14410740 watch 14411137 watch 14387355 watch 14379469 watch 14386798 watch

satisfactory 22 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
6 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-20 4y 5m ago 23/25 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14198852 watch 14183460 watch 14222571 watch 14242657 watch 14141804 watch 14221113 watch 14244459 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 21 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
6 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-31 4y 6m ago 22/25 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

13126796 watch 13143170 watch 13125864 watch 13126423 watch 13146992 watch 13150250 watch 13125168 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
7 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements