Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-18

← Sudhanshu Shekhar Prusty

Pedagogy reviews

good 2026-09-17 1 month ago 10/10 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

79417661 watch 79415450 watch 79548057 watch 79436101 watch 79436565 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • push student 0/1

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • concept explain 1/1
  • concept identify 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • solution simple question 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check concept 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
38 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-15 4y 6m ago 15/19 (79%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

13883243 watch 13530332 watch 13747509 watch 13529360 watch 13684812 watch 13883579 watch 13747425 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • asking to rate 0/1
  • camera stability 0/1
  • paper quality 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 13 criteria

  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • misconduct
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-02-13 4y 8m ago 4/8 (50%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

9956578 watch 10104754 watch 9887762 watch 10016404 watch 9957292 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • handwriting 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 4 criteria

  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • long pauses 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
23 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • lighting
  • misconduct
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-02-01 4y 8m ago 7/13 (54%) · not acknowledged

poor 4 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • long pauses 0/2
  • solution provided 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 5 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
19 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements