Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-18

← Dr.Keshav Kant Sharma

Pedagogy reviews

good 2026-09-12 1 month ago 8/8 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

79536677 watch 79527191 watch 79524172 watch 79447605 watch 79488609 watch 79527337 watch

satisfactory 16 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • concept explain 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • push student 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • solution simple question 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check concept 1/1
43 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-02-22 3y 7m ago 15/21 (71%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

22888973 watch 22851385 watch 22805332 watch 22850588 watch 26388710 watch 22851515 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • greetings 0/2
  • profile pic 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 13 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
42 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-10-06 4 years ago 13/15 (87%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

22666613 watch 22750077 watch 22750848 watch 22751005 watch 22749959 watch 22750800 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • profile pic

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-30 4y 1m ago 22/27 (81%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20605495 watch 20601763 watch 20622888 watch 20574104 watch 20601947 watch 20599730 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • greetings 0/2
  • paper division 0/1

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-24 4y 1m ago 22/27 (81%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20243448 watch 20242647 watch 20242010 watch 20250897 watch 20243680 watch 20252563 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • paper division 0/1
  • table setup 0/1
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-03 4y 2m ago 10/12 (83%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19160823 watch 19159809 watch 19005503 watch 18877791 watch 19030254 watch 19159343 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 6 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
23 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-07-28 4y 2m ago 19/23 (83%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

18816017 watch 18791717 watch 18813777 watch 18850776 watch 18710481 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • greetings 0/2
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
12 criteria not applicable
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements