Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-16

← Ritika Rathi

Pedagogy reviews

poor 2022-04-18 4y 6m ago 21/24 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14064431 watch 14088539 watch 14065070 watch 14064799 watch 13973682 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
7 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-13 4y 6m ago 20/23 (87%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

13872004 watch 13922220 watch 13922445 watch 13924587 watch 13870341 watch 13927845 watch 13778879 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-07 4y 6m ago 21/24 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

13577584 watch 13577483 watch 13521274 watch 13631724 watch 13523894 watch 13525520 watch 13623512 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
7 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-02-25 4y 7m ago 15/23 (65%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11118778 watch 10876565 watch 11031396 watch 10849012 watch 11118260 watch 11094527 watch

poor 6 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • closure 0/1
  • paper quality 0/1
  • session intro delay 0/1
  • solution provided 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 13 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-02-11 4y 8m ago 15/23 (65%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

10137642 watch 10264765 watch 10474850 watch 10354408 watch 10372183 watch

poor 5 criteria

  • camera angle 0/1
  • camera stability 0/1
  • paper division 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 15 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1
9 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-02-03 4y 8m ago 17/17 (100%) · not acknowledged

poor 2 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • closure

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate
  • camera angle 1/1
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • greetings
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • opens camera
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup
  • usage on visual elements
11 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • proficiency
  • student addressal
  • text alignment