Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-10

← Tushar Keshari

Pedagogy reviews

poor 2022-08-26 4y 1m ago 19/25 (76%) · tutor said understood

Sessions reviewed

20200548 watch 19994665 watch 20082930 watch 20222836 watch 19994784 watch 20199591 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • greetings 0/2
  • paper quality 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-18 4y 1m ago 20/25 (80%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19818497 watch 19883715 watch 19884530 watch 19821920 watch 19729247 watch 19861854 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • greetings 0/2
  • paper quality 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-11 4y 2m ago 18/23 (78%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19344922 watch 19345011 watch 19555210 watch 19423320 watch 19355728 watch 19345781 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • greetings 0/2
  • paper quality 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 16 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
12 criteria not applicable
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements