Pedagogy reviews
poor 2026-09-14 26 days ago 12/13 (92%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
79418642 watch 79546427 watch 79578686 watch 79574285 watch 79421576 watch 79420616 watch
poor 1 criteria
- pen 0/1
satisfactory 22 criteria
- asking to rate us 1/1
- background noise us 1/1
- camera stability 1/1
- component on whiteboard 1/1
- concept explain 1/1
- confirm problem 1/1
- final solution 1/1
- greet energy us 1/1
- greeting us 1/1
- handwriting us 1/1
- lighting 1/1
- long pauses us 1/1
- need identification 1/1
- profile pic us 1/1
- push student 1/1
- session intro delay us 1/1
- shadowing 1/1
- student addressal us 1/1
- table setup 1/1
- text alignment us 1/1
- understanding check concept 1/1
- understanding check step 1/1
36 criteria not applicable
- asking to rate
- background noise
- camera angle
- closure
- concept identify
- courteousness
- explain again
- fluency
- greenboard
- greet energy
- greetings
- handwriting
- input devices us
- long pauses
- misconduct
- misconduct us
- motivational conversation
- open conversations
- open conversations us
- opens camera
- paper division
- paper quality
- physical whiteboard
- problem breakdown
- problem establishment
- profile pic
- roadmap
- session engagement
- session intro delay
- solution provided
- solution simple question
- step understand
- student addressal
- text alignment
- understanding check
- usage on visual elements
poor 2023-05-10 3y 5m ago 12/17 (71%) · tutor said understood
Sessions reviewed
29013362 watch 28682188 watch 28655280 watch 28944740 watch 28666797 watch
poor 3 criteria
- closure 0/1
- profile pic 0/1
- solution provided 0/1
satisfactory 8 criteria
- asking to rate 1/1
- background noise 1/1
- fluency 1/1
- long pauses 1/2
- misconduct 1/1
- open conversations 1/2
- session intro delay 1/1
- student addressal 1/1
good 2 criteria
- greet energy 2/2
- greetings 2/2
46 criteria not applicable
- asking to rate us
- background noise us
- camera angle
- camera stability
- component on whiteboard
- concept explain
- concept identify
- confirm problem
- courteousness
- explain again
- final solution
- greenboard
- greet energy us
- greeting us
- handwriting
- handwriting us
- input devices us
- lighting
- long pauses us
- misconduct us
- motivational conversation
- need identification
- open conversations us
- opens camera
- paper division
- paper quality
- pen
- physical whiteboard
- problem breakdown
- problem establishment
- profile pic us
- push student
- roadmap
- session engagement
- session intro delay us
- shadowing
- solution simple question
- step understand
- student addressal us
- table setup
- text alignment
- text alignment us
- understanding check
- understanding check concept
- understanding check step
- usage on visual elements
poor 2023-04-14 3y 6m ago 11/16 (69%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
28613076 watch 28625912 watch 28596607 watch 28580865 watch 28603955 watch 28583027 watch
poor 3 criteria
- handwriting 0/1
- profile pic 0/1
- student addressal 0/1
satisfactory 7 criteria
- asking to rate 1/1
- background noise 1/1
- fluency 1/1
- long pauses 1/2
- misconduct 1/1
- open conversations 1/2
- session intro delay 1/1
good 2 criteria
- greet energy 2/2
- greetings 2/2
47 criteria not applicable
- asking to rate us
- background noise us
- camera angle
- camera stability
- closure
- component on whiteboard
- concept explain
- concept identify
- confirm problem
- courteousness
- explain again
- final solution
- greenboard
- greet energy us
- greeting us
- handwriting us
- input devices us
- lighting
- long pauses us
- misconduct us
- motivational conversation
- need identification
- open conversations us
- opens camera
- paper division
- paper quality
- pen
- physical whiteboard
- problem breakdown
- problem establishment
- profile pic us
- push student
- roadmap
- session engagement
- session intro delay us
- shadowing
- solution provided
- solution simple question
- step understand
- student addressal us
- table setup
- text alignment
- text alignment us
- understanding check
- understanding check concept
- understanding check step
- usage on visual elements
poor 2023-04-09 3y 6m ago 9/17 (53%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
28569644 watch 28575822 watch 28575870 watch 28554334 watch 28570251 watch 28553583 watch
poor 5 criteria
- greetings 0/2
- paper quality 0/1
- profile pic 0/1
- student addressal 0/1
- table setup 0/1
satisfactory 7 criteria
- asking to rate 1/1
- background noise 1/1
- fluency 1/1
- long pauses 1/2
- misconduct 1/1
- open conversations 1/2
- session intro delay 1/1
good 1 criteria
- greet energy 2/2
46 criteria not applicable
- asking to rate us
- background noise us
- camera angle
- camera stability
- closure
- component on whiteboard
- concept explain
- concept identify
- confirm problem
- courteousness
- explain again
- final solution
- greenboard
- greet energy us
- greeting us
- handwriting
- handwriting us
- input devices us
- lighting
- long pauses us
- misconduct us
- motivational conversation
- need identification
- open conversations us
- opens camera
- paper division
- pen
- physical whiteboard
- problem breakdown
- problem establishment
- profile pic us
- push student
- roadmap
- session engagement
- session intro delay us
- shadowing
- solution provided
- solution simple question
- step understand
- student addressal us
- text alignment
- text alignment us
- understanding check
- understanding check concept
- understanding check step
- usage on visual elements