Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-18

← Saurav Kumar

Pedagogy reviews

poor 2022-12-30 3y 9m ago 20/23 (87%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26135124 watch 26270499 watch 26134860 watch 26122622 watch 26270994 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • paper quality 0/1
  • profile pic
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 16 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
26 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • component whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • end concept understanding
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • simple question
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • step understand us
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-12-19 3y 10m ago 18/21 (86%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

25805002 watch 25880889 watch 25870142 watch 25793899 watch 25895970 watch 25945729 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • paper quality 0/1
  • pen 0/1
  • profile pic

satisfactory 16 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
13 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • greetings
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-12-06 3y 10m ago 18/24 (75%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

25265755 watch 25515330 watch 25504679 watch 25445773 watch 25489241 watch

poor 5 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • greetings 0/2
  • long pauses 0/2
  • paper quality 0/1
  • solution provided 0/1

satisfactory 16 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • lighting 1/1
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-10-25 3y 11m ago 19/23 (83%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

23642401 watch 23725589 watch 23598338 watch 23598167 watch 23682544 watch 23585876 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • greetings 0/2
  • paper quality 0/1
  • profile pic

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
12 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-10-19 4 years ago 21/25 (84%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

23513530 watch 23520348 watch 23514144 watch 23510878 watch 23518507 watch 23523361 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • greetings 0/2
  • profile pic

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-10-10 4 years ago 10/15 (67%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

22989849 watch 23017807 watch 23018024 watch 23034103 watch 23009489 watch 23031208 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • greetings 0/2
  • profile pic
  • solution provided 0/1

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-10-02 4 years ago 23/26 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

22587389 watch 22590137 watch 22594451 watch 22593319 watch 22587851 watch 22587664 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • greetings 0/2
  • profile pic

satisfactory 21 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-07-20 4y 3m ago 21/22 (95%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

18364713 watch 18388248 watch 18394086 watch 18391362 watch 18366147 watch 18391987 watch

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • step understand
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-07-05 4y 3m ago 20/23 (87%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

16791442 watch 17131073 watch 17090526 watch 17579863 watch 16910897 watch 17089245 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • greetings 0/2

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy
10 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-06-15 4y 4m ago 7/13 (54%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

16632426 watch 16632616 watch 16592851 watch 16625743 watch 16484099 watch 16609583 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • long pauses 0/2
  • solution provided 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 7 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • greetings 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-06-10 4y 4m ago 21/23 (91%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15993162 watch 16407474 watch 16412564 watch 16392380 watch 16413772 watch 16388823 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-05-30 4y 4m ago 20/21 (95%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15906783 watch 15934347 watch 15816888 watch 15907909 watch 15937775 watch

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
12 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-05-26 4y 4m ago 21/24 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15716822 watch 15756828 watch 15669356 watch 15713573 watch 15760171 watch 15760846 watch 15761232 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • lighting 0/1
  • shadowing 0/1

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-05-19 4y 5m ago 21/23 (91%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15443598 watch 15445529 watch 15429847 watch 15445394 watch 15467070 watch 15468122 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • paper quality 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • greet energy
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-05-12 4y 5m ago 20/22 (91%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15204804 watch 15180540 watch 15177863 watch 15206407 watch 15207971 watch 15200257 watch 15208679 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • paper quality 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-05-08 4y 5m ago 22/23 (96%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15030781 watch 15036570 watch 15030366 watch 15046210 watch 15045914 watch 15024644 watch 15032685 watch

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-05-03 4y 5m ago 21/23 (91%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14814859 watch 14792825 watch 14808115 watch 14814023 watch 14794233 watch 14799714 watch 14804340 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • paper division 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-28 4y 5m ago 21/23 (91%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14572921 watch 14582880 watch 14527253 watch 14571164 watch 14582767 watch 14579223 watch 14527485 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • solution provided 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-24 4y 5m ago 22/24 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14380731 watch 14381275 watch 14380273 watch 14343647 watch 14402555 watch 14399902 watch 14392768 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • paper division 0/1

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
7 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-04-20 4y 6m ago 23/24 (96%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14178980 watch 14186136 watch 14196475 watch 14186600 watch 14247799 watch 14140666 watch 14245110 watch

satisfactory 21 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
7 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-15 4y 6m ago 21/23 (91%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

13644884 watch 14029878 watch 14008142 watch 14005380 watch 13991205 watch 14008666 watch 13933331 watch 14028423 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-04-11 4y 6m ago 22/23 (96%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

13752901 watch 13817727 watch 13824741 watch 13815928 watch 13845059 watch 13819085 watch 13812976 watch

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-04-10 4y 6m ago 22/23 (96%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

13752117 watch 13752901 watch 13773734 watch 13769158 watch 13788579 watch 13767733 watch 13765990 watch

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-05 4y 6m ago 21/23 (91%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

13513147 watch 13521048 watch 13514370 watch 13518665 watch 13521371 watch 13516865 watch 13517157 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • solution provided 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements