Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-19

← Aman Kumar

Pedagogy reviews

poor 2023-02-13 3y 8m ago 22/28 (79%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

27452938 watch 27471806 watch 27454274 watch 27471408 watch 27471311 watch 27453213 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • closure 0/1
  • paper division 0/1
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
35 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution simple question
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-01-19 3y 9m ago 15/18 (83%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26771942 watch 26771713 watch 26771595 watch 26771626 watch 26771751 watch 26771826 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
33 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • simple question
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand us
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-01-11 3y 9m ago 16/21 (76%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26524331 watch 26549870 watch 26524146 watch 26495553 watch 26550010 watch 26550239 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • greetings 0/2
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 14 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
28 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • simple question
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • step understand us
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-12-21 3y 10m ago 15/15 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26044952 watch 26045330 watch 26045476 watch 26045634 watch 26045121 watch 26045722 watch

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements