Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-14

← Pallela Sarath Chandhan

Pedagogy reviews

good 2023-01-23 3y 8m ago 24/26 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

24802677 watch 24801405 watch 26500194 watch 26891473 watch 26501536 watch

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
37 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-11-17 3y 11m ago 20/21 (95%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

24616151 watch 24707480 watch 24507601 watch 24509948 watch 24653447 watch 24704417 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • solution provided 0/1

satisfactory 16 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
14 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-11-03 3y 11m ago 17/25 (68%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

24023779 watch 24024093 watch 24069934 watch 24092966 watch 24071605 watch 24071353 watch

poor 7 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • greetings 0/2
  • paper division 0/1
  • paper quality 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 15 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements