Pedagogy reviews
poor 2023-05-08 3y 5m ago 13/17 (76%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
28683659 watch 28980422 watch 28683003 watch 27972298 watch 21555331 watch 28636413 watch
poor 2 criteria
- closure 0/1
- solution provided 0/1
satisfactory 9 criteria
- asking to rate 1/1
- background noise 1/1
- fluency 1/1
- long pauses 1/2
- misconduct 1/1
- open conversations 1/2
- profile pic 1/1
- session intro delay 1/1
- student addressal 1/1
good 2 criteria
- greet energy 2/2
- greetings 2/2
46 criteria not applicable
- asking to rate us
- background noise us
- camera angle
- camera stability
- component on whiteboard
- concept explain
- concept identify
- confirm problem
- courteousness
- explain again
- final solution
- greenboard
- greet energy us
- greeting us
- handwriting
- handwriting us
- input devices us
- lighting
- long pauses us
- misconduct us
- motivational conversation
- need identification
- open conversations us
- opens camera
- paper division
- paper quality
- pen
- physical whiteboard
- problem breakdown
- problem establishment
- profile pic us
- push student
- roadmap
- session engagement
- session intro delay us
- shadowing
- solution simple question
- step understand
- student addressal us
- table setup
- text alignment
- text alignment us
- understanding check
- understanding check concept
- understanding check step
- usage on visual elements
good 2022-09-14 4 years ago 17/18 (94%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
21427553 watch 21319291 watch 21412560 watch 21318809 watch 21317321 watch 21146873 watch
poor 1 criteria
- profile pic
satisfactory 13 criteria
- asking to rate 1/1
- background noise 1/1
- camera angle 1/1
- closure 1/1
- fluency
- lighting 1/1
- long pauses 1/2
- misconduct 1/1
- open conversations 1/2
- session intro delay 1/1
- shadowing 1/1
- solution provided 1/1
- student addressal 1/1
good 2 criteria
- greet energy 2/2
- greetings 2/2
17 criteria not applicable
- camera stability
- courteousness
- greenboard
- handwriting
- motivational conversation
- opens camera
- paper division
- paper quality
- pen
- physical whiteboard
- problem breakdown
- problem establishment
- session engagement
- step understand
- table setup
- text alignment
- usage on visual elements
poor 2022-09-08 4y 1m ago 12/18 (67%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
21087580 watch 21085662 watch 21082798 watch 21060506 watch 21058416 watch 21089881 watch
poor 4 criteria
- camera stability 0/1
- closure 0/1
- greetings 0/2
- student addressal 0/1
satisfactory 10 criteria
- asking to rate 1/1
- background noise 1/1
- fluency
- handwriting 1/1
- long pauses 1/2
- misconduct 1/1
- open conversations 1/2
- session intro delay 1/1
- solution provided 1/1
- step understand 1/1
good 1 criteria
- greet energy 2/2
17 criteria not applicable
- camera angle
- courteousness
- greenboard
- lighting
- motivational conversation
- opens camera
- paper division
- paper quality
- pen
- physical whiteboard
- problem breakdown
- problem establishment
- session engagement
- shadowing
- table setup
- text alignment
- usage on visual elements