Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-16

← Akash Kumar

Pedagogy reviews

poor 2023-02-21 3y 7m ago 22/27 (81%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

27691003 watch 27626787 watch 27681180 watch 27654445 watch 27625634 watch 27568723 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
36 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • camera angle
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution simple question
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-02-07 3y 8m ago 19/28 (68%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

27236985 watch 27242248 watch 27250552 watch 27241620 watch 27253180 watch 27234845 watch

poor 6 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • closure 0/1
  • greetings 0/2
  • paper division 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
35 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution simple question
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-11-24 3y 10m ago 23/26 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

24827816 watch 24918865 watch 24844245 watch 24830153 watch 24982044 watch 24824103 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • closure 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-11-18 3y 11m ago 21/24 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

24787117 watch 24779376 watch 24785327 watch 24785833 watch 24732593 watch 24733564 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • closure 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-11-09 3y 11m ago 11/13 (85%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

24302645 watch 24301641 watch 24299319 watch 24379138 watch 24298637 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • profile pic
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 7 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
22 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements