Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-10

← Saalik Khan

Pedagogy reviews

good 2026-09-27 13 days ago 7/7 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

80012793 watch 79353605 watch 79947468 watch 80067942 watch 80008089 watch

satisfactory 14 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
45 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2026-09-06 1 month ago 6/9 (67%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

79239292 watch 79268213 watch 32241615 watch 79222532 watch 79268084 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • final solution 0/1
  • long pauses us 0/1
  • profile pic us 0/1

satisfactory 12 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
44 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-09-18 4 years ago 17/18 (94%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

21710127 watch 21716617 watch 21719891 watch 21712747 watch 21717368 watch 21714971 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 13 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • problem breakdown 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
17 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-09-12 4 years ago 15/17 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

21109967 watch 21300977 watch 21063567 watch 21004006 watch 21120422 watch 21230120 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
19 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-09-06 4y 1m ago 13/17 (76%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20969154 watch 20952119 watch 20884872 watch 20831759 watch 20970010 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • greetings 0/2
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
18 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements