Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-10

← Dharmendra Kumar

Pedagogy reviews

good 2022-10-02 4 years ago 12/13 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

22330510 watch 22334837 watch 22392670 watch 22395717 watch 22392815 watch 22395588 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
22 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-09-26 4 years ago 12/13 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

22312732 watch 22198947 watch 22071964 watch 22308439 watch 22137710 watch 22122686 watch

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
22 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-09-22 4 years ago 21/24 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

21992958 watch 21993096 watch 22020241 watch 22044372 watch 22009023 watch 22005623 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • profile pic
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-09-07 4y 1m ago 14/15 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

21012767 watch 20764919 watch 21032706 watch 20989884 watch 20952787 watch 20935341 watch

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-08-30 4y 1m ago 12/13 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20597169 watch 20615907 watch 20629726 watch 20516656 watch 20170119 watch 20204010 watch

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
22 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-08-22 4y 1m ago 12/13 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20038491 watch 20021948 watch 20052878 watch 19964530 watch 20168996 watch 19969374 watch

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
22 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements