Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-09

← Shubham

Pedagogy reviews

good 2022-09-04 4y 1m ago 14/15 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20724537 watch 20895115 watch 20894657 watch 20870863 watch 20865702 watch 20720569 watch

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-28 4y 1m ago 17/22 (77%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20433834 watch 20145867 watch 20402446 watch 20377762 watch 20436632 watch 20539891 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • greetings 0/2
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 15 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
13 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements