Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-19

← Shivam Tiwari

Pedagogy reviews

good 2025-11-14 11 months ago 17/17 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

67066401 watch 67066529 watch 67268973 watch 67219300 watch 67113652 watch

satisfactory 26 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • concept identify 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution simple question 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check concept 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
33 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2025-11-06 11 months ago 13/14 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

66585583 watch 67016686 watch 67016856 watch 67017250 watch 67017335 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • final solution 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • background noise us 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
39 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-02-07 3y 8m ago 22/27 (81%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

27312494 watch 27311834 watch 27304540 watch 27301451 watch 27116694 watch 27289471 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • long pauses 0/2
  • solution provided 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
36 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution simple question
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

good 2023-01-30 3y 8m ago 15/17 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

27074581 watch 27012380 watch 27006512 watch 27006160 watch 27045002 watch

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
46 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • shadowing
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-01-24 3y 8m ago 25/28 (89%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26873386 watch 26922577 watch 26873711 watch 26874717 watch 26772871 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 21 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
35 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution simple question
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-01-18 3y 9m ago 12/17 (71%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26565607 watch 26723782 watch 26681232 watch 26681769 watch 26716862 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • long pauses 0/2
  • solution provided 0/1

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
34 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • simple question
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • step understand us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

good 2023-01-09 3y 9m ago 23/23 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26516769 watch 26519698 watch 26474599 watch 26491547 watch 26491021 watch 26467332 watch

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
26 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • end concept understanding
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • simple question
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • step understand us
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

good 2023-01-01 3y 9m ago 13/13 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26317170 watch 26316613 watch 26316873 watch 26304498 watch 26316765 watch

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
36 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • component whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • end concept understanding
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • simple question
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • step understand us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-12-21 3y 10m ago 23/23 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

25826995 watch 25979277 watch 25817048 watch 25955887 watch 26015522 watch 26046018 watch

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
12 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-12-11 3y 10m ago 12/13 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

25721779 watch 25687321 watch 25723778 watch 25420319 watch 25646256 watch 25675097 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
22 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements