Pedagogy reviews
good 2026-01-30 8 months ago 10/10 (100%) · tutor said need help
Sessions reviewed
71029637 watch 71030702 watch 71037366 watch 71068384 watch 71032140 watch 71039544 watch
satisfactory 18 criteria
- asking to rate us 1/1
- background noise us 1/1
- component on whiteboard 1/1
- confirm problem 1/1
- final solution 1/1
- greet energy us 1/1
- greeting us 1/1
- handwriting us 1/1
- long pauses us 1/1
- need identification 1/1
- profile pic us 1/1
- push student 1/1
- session intro delay us 1/1
- solution simple question 1/1
- student addressal us 1/1
- text alignment us 1/1
- understanding check 1/1
- understanding check step 1/1
41 criteria not applicable
- asking to rate
- background noise
- camera angle
- camera stability
- closure
- concept explain
- concept identify
- courteousness
- explain again
- fluency
- greenboard
- greet energy
- greetings
- handwriting
- input devices us
- lighting
- long pauses
- misconduct
- misconduct us
- motivational conversation
- open conversations
- open conversations us
- opens camera
- paper division
- paper quality
- pen
- physical whiteboard
- problem breakdown
- problem establishment
- profile pic
- roadmap
- session engagement
- session intro delay
- shadowing
- solution provided
- step understand
- student addressal
- table setup
- text alignment
- understanding check concept
- usage on visual elements
good 2026-01-14 9 months ago 10/10 (100%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
70134267 watch 69718899 watch 70194580 watch 70288033 watch 70242378 watch
poor 1 criteria
- session intro delay us 0/1
satisfactory 20 criteria
- asking to rate us 1/1
- background noise us 1/1
- component on whiteboard 1/1
- concept explain 1/1
- concept identify 1/1
- confirm problem 1/1
- final solution 1/1
- greet energy us 1/1
- greeting us 1/1
- handwriting us 1/1
- long pauses us 1/1
- need identification 1/1
- profile pic us 1/1
- push student 1/1
- solution simple question 1/1
- student addressal us 1/1
- text alignment us 1/1
- understanding check 1/1
- understanding check concept 1/1
- understanding check step 1/1
38 criteria not applicable
- asking to rate
- background noise
- camera angle
- camera stability
- closure
- courteousness
- explain again
- fluency
- greenboard
- greet energy
- greetings
- handwriting
- input devices us
- lighting
- long pauses
- misconduct
- misconduct us
- motivational conversation
- open conversations
- open conversations us
- opens camera
- paper division
- paper quality
- pen
- physical whiteboard
- problem breakdown
- problem establishment
- profile pic
- roadmap
- session engagement
- session intro delay
- shadowing
- solution provided
- step understand
- student addressal
- table setup
- text alignment
- usage on visual elements
good 2025-12-29 9 months ago 5/5 (100%) · tutor said not understood
Sessions reviewed
69022837 watch 69224372 watch 69290756 watch 69567718 watch 68904300 watch 69605037 watch
poor 2 criteria
- component on whiteboard 0/1
- session intro delay us 0/1
satisfactory 9 criteria
- asking to rate us 1/1
- background noise us 1/1
- confirm problem 1/1
- greet energy us 1/1
- greeting us 1/1
- long pauses us 1/1
- need identification 1/1
- profile pic us 1/1
- student addressal us 1/1
48 criteria not applicable
- asking to rate
- background noise
- camera angle
- camera stability
- closure
- concept explain
- concept identify
- courteousness
- explain again
- final solution
- fluency
- greenboard
- greet energy
- greetings
- handwriting
- handwriting us
- input devices us
- lighting
- long pauses
- misconduct
- misconduct us
- motivational conversation
- open conversations
- open conversations us
- opens camera
- paper division
- paper quality
- pen
- physical whiteboard
- problem breakdown
- problem establishment
- profile pic
- push student
- roadmap
- session engagement
- session intro delay
- shadowing
- solution provided
- solution simple question
- step understand
- student addressal
- table setup
- text alignment
- text alignment us
- understanding check
- understanding check concept
- understanding check step
- usage on visual elements
good 2025-12-12 10 months ago 8/8 (100%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
68759596 watch 68764121 watch 68736324 watch 68875534 watch 68761497 watch 68821558 watch
poor 1 criteria
- session intro delay us 0/1
satisfactory 17 criteria
- background noise us 1/1
- component on whiteboard 1/1
- concept identify 1/1
- confirm problem 1/1
- final solution 1/1
- greet energy us 1/1
- greeting us 1/1
- handwriting us 1/1
- long pauses us 1/1
- need identification 1/1
- profile pic us 1/1
- push student 1/1
- student addressal us 1/1
- text alignment us 1/1
- understanding check 1/1
- understanding check concept 1/1
- understanding check step 1/1
41 criteria not applicable
- asking to rate
- asking to rate us
- background noise
- camera angle
- camera stability
- closure
- concept explain
- courteousness
- explain again
- fluency
- greenboard
- greet energy
- greetings
- handwriting
- input devices us
- lighting
- long pauses
- misconduct
- misconduct us
- motivational conversation
- open conversations
- open conversations us
- opens camera
- paper division
- paper quality
- pen
- physical whiteboard
- problem breakdown
- problem establishment
- profile pic
- roadmap
- session engagement
- session intro delay
- shadowing
- solution provided
- solution simple question
- step understand
- student addressal
- table setup
- text alignment
- usage on visual elements