Pedagogy reviews

good 2026-09-23 21 days ago 10/10 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

79859677 watch 79863157 watch 79856141 watch 79853891 watch 79911458 watch

satisfactory 17 criteria

asking to rate us 1/1
background noise us 1/1
component on whiteboard 1/1
confirm problem 1/1
final solution 1/1
greet energy us 1/1
greeting us 1/1
handwriting us 1/1
long pauses us 1/1
need identification 1/1
profile pic us 1/1
session intro delay us 1/1
solution simple question 1/1
student addressal us 1/1
text alignment us 1/1
understanding check 1/1
understanding check step 1/1

42 criteria not applicable

good 2022-08-15 4y 2m ago 15/16 (94%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19641069 watch 19636961 watch 19603426 watch 19619418 watch 19618688 watch 19635897 watch 19646089 watch

satisfactory 11 criteria

asking to rate 1/1
background noise 1/1
closure 1/1
fluency
greenboard 1/1
handwriting 1/1
long pauses 1/2
misconduct 1/1
open conversations 1/2
session intro delay 1/1
student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

greet energy 2/2
greetings 2/2

19 criteria not applicable

camera angle
camera stability
courteousness
lighting
motivational conversation
opens camera
paper division
paper quality
pen
physical whiteboard
problem breakdown
problem establishment
session engagement
shadowing
solution provided
step understand
table setup
text alignment
usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-09 4y 2m ago 14/17 (82%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19457648 watch 19452996 watch 19457767 watch 19454003 watch 19482524 watch 19453580 watch 19452618 watch 19482594 watch

poor 1 criteria

greetings 0/2

satisfactory 12 criteria

asking to rate 1/1
background noise 1/1
fluency
greenboard 1/1
handwriting 1/1
long pauses 1/2
misconduct 1/1
open conversations 1/2
session intro delay 1/1
solution provided 1/1
step understand 1/1
student addressal 1/1

good 1 criteria

greet energy 2/2

18 criteria not applicable

camera angle
camera stability
closure
courteousness
lighting
motivational conversation
opens camera
paper division
paper quality
pen
physical whiteboard
problem breakdown
problem establishment
session engagement
shadowing
table setup
text alignment
usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-05 4y 2m ago 21/24 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19258992 watch 19256364 watch 19262479 watch 19264626 watch 19260728 watch 19256266 watch

poor 2 criteria

camera stability 0/1
table setup 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

asking to rate 1/1
background noise 1/1
camera angle 1/1
fluency
greenboard 1/1
handwriting 1/1
lighting 1/1
long pauses 1/2
misconduct 1/1
open conversations 1/2
paper division 1/1
paper quality 1/1
pen 1/1
session intro delay 1/1
shadowing 1/1
student addressal 1/1
text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

greet energy 2/2
greetings 2/2

11 criteria not applicable

closure
courteousness
motivational conversation
opens camera
physical whiteboard
problem breakdown
problem establishment
session engagement
solution provided
step understand
usage on visual elements