Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-10

← Sonali Singh

Pedagogy reviews

good 2026-09-30 9 days ago 10/10 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

80286148 watch 80334359 watch 80228702 watch 80333538 watch 80295059 watch

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • push student 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • solution simple question 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
41 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-02-19 3y 7m ago 13/16 (81%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

27472108 watch 27523812 watch 27594593 watch 27589277 watch 27360731 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • handwriting 0/1

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
47 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-01-16 3y 8m ago 14/17 (82%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26684081 watch 26684430 watch 26654412 watch 26658154 watch 26676101 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • profile pic
  • solution provided 0/1

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
32 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • simple question
  • solution simple question
  • step understand us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-01-08 3y 9m ago 13/14 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26507959 watch 26507879 watch 26485885 watch 26483827 watch 26457424 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
35 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • end concept understanding
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • simple question
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • step understand us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-01-04 3y 9m ago 14/15 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26366849 watch 26362449 watch 26366130 watch 26362701 watch 26362293 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
34 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • end concept understanding
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • simple question
  • solution provided
  • step understand us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-12-29 3y 9m ago 12/16 (75%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26242142 watch 26077775 watch 26209035 watch 26237399 watch 26206910 watch 26265544 watch 26265753 watch 26030233 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • long pauses 0/2
  • profile pic
  • solution provided 0/1

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
32 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • concept explanation
  • concept identify
  • concept understanding
  • courteousness
  • end concept understanding
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem confirmation
  • problem establishment
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • simple question
  • step by step
  • step understand
  • student need identification
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements
  • whiteboard component

poor 2022-12-19 3y 9m ago 16/17 (94%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

25929589 watch 25968767 watch 25922334 watch 25930321 watch 25930240 watch 25873876 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 12 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
18 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-12-12 3y 10m ago 15/18 (83%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

25695205 watch 25708236 watch 25690526 watch 25695306 watch 25634127 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • profile pic
  • solution provided 0/1

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • problem breakdown 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
17 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-10-09 4 years ago 14/15 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

22722639 watch 22603196 watch 22725508 watch 22965688 watch 22953483 watch 22637915 watch

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-08-23 4y 1m ago 15/16 (94%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20041283 watch 20217979 watch 19975330 watch 19612848 watch 19711484 watch 19780337 watch

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
19 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-08-12 4y 1m ago 17/18 (94%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19568859 watch 19530665 watch 19567430 watch 19568032 watch 19568335 watch 19567475 watch

satisfactory 13 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
17 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-08-02 4y 2m ago 18/19 (95%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19105524 watch 19074370 watch 19105172 watch 19103675 watch 19093681 watch 19086329 watch

satisfactory 14 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • problem breakdown 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
16 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-07-27 4y 2m ago 10/13 (77%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

18752251 watch 18749229 watch 18759061 watch 18748648 watch 18753033 watch 18751417 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • greetings 0/2
  • handwriting 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements