← Sudhir Kumar Singh

Pedagogy reviews

good 2026-09-14 27 days ago 16/16 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

79504249 watch 79462173 watch 79620247 watch 79542327 watch 79541966 watch

satisfactory 27 criteria

background noise us 1/1
camera stability 1/1
component on whiteboard 1/1
concept explain 1/1
concept identify 1/1
confirm problem 1/1
final solution 1/1
greet energy us 1/1
greeting us 1/1
handwriting us 1/1
lighting 1/1
long pauses us 1/1
need identification 1/1
paper division 1/1
paper quality 1/1
pen 1/1
profile pic us 1/1
push student 1/1
session intro delay us 1/1
shadowing 1/1
solution simple question 1/1
student addressal us 1/1
table setup 1/1
text alignment us 1/1
understanding check 1/1
understanding check concept 1/1
understanding check step 1/1

32 criteria not applicable

good 2022-07-27 4y 2m ago 26/26 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

18564181 watch 18509553 watch 18679214 watch 18562536 watch 18396817 watch 18408034 watch

satisfactory 22 criteria

asking to rate 1/1
background noise 1/1
camera angle 1/1
camera stability 1/1
closure 1/1
fluency
greenboard 1/1
handwriting 1/1
lighting 1/1
long pauses 1/2
misconduct 1/1
open conversations 1/2
paper division 1/1
paper quality 1/1
pen 1/1
session intro delay 1/1
shadowing 1/1
solution provided 1/1
step understand
student addressal 1/1
table setup 1/1
text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

greet energy
greetings 2/2

8 criteria not applicable

courteousness
motivational conversation
opens camera
physical whiteboard
problem breakdown
problem establishment
session engagement
usage on visual elements

poor 2022-07-18 4y 2m ago 22/24 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

18197378 watch 18197636 watch 18165747 watch 18194735 watch 18162614 watch

poor 1 criteria

table setup 0/1

satisfactory 21 criteria

asking to rate 1/1
background noise 1/1
camera angle 1/1
camera stability 1/1
closure 1/1
fluency
greenboard 1/1
handwriting 1/1
lighting 1/1
long pauses 1/2
misconduct 1/1
open conversations 1/2
paper division 1/1
paper quality 1/1
pen 1/1
session intro delay 1/1
shadowing 1/1
solution provided 1/1
step understand
student addressal 1/1
text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

greet energy
greetings 2/2

8 criteria not applicable

courteousness
motivational conversation
opens camera
physical whiteboard
problem breakdown
problem establishment
session engagement
usage on visual elements

poor 2022-07-12 4y 3m ago 11/15 (73%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

17847420 watch 17895537 watch 17849706 watch 17955710 watch 17821111 watch 17957797 watch

poor 3 criteria

camera stability 0/1
closure 0/1
table setup 0/1

satisfactory 9 criteria

asking to rate 1/1
background noise 1/1
fluency
long pauses 1/2
misconduct 1/1
open conversations 1/2
session intro delay 1/1
solution provided 1/1
student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

greet energy
greetings 2/2

18 criteria not applicable

camera angle
courteousness
greenboard
handwriting
lighting
motivational conversation
opens camera
paper division
paper quality
pen
physical whiteboard
problem breakdown
problem establishment
session engagement
shadowing
step understand
text alignment
usage on visual elements