Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-11

← Rajat Kumar

Pedagogy reviews

good 2025-11-07 11 months ago 6/6 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

66643733 watch 66728386 watch 66729701 watch 66727575 watch 67048505 watch

satisfactory 13 criteria

  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
46 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2025-10-24 11 months ago 5/8 (62%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

66347135 watch 66347638 watch 66328773 watch 66287204 watch 66306851 watch

poor 5 criteria

  • component on whiteboard 0/1
  • greet energy us 0/1
  • long pauses us 0/1
  • student addressal us 0/1
  • text alignment us 0/1

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • concept identify 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • understanding check concept 1/1
43 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2025-10-21 11 months ago 6/7 (86%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

66140636 watch 66130806 watch 66143668 watch 66143694 watch 66163436 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • component on whiteboard 0/1
  • final solution 0/1

satisfactory 14 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • concept explain 1/1
  • concept identify 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • solution simple question 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • understanding check concept 1/1
43 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2025-10-12 12 months ago 6/9 (67%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

65734692 watch 65851090 watch 65848952 watch 65590953 watch 65625851 watch

poor 9 criteria

  • component on whiteboard 0/1
  • concept explain 0/1
  • concept identify 0/1
  • final solution 0/1
  • greeting us 0/1
  • push student 0/1
  • understanding check 0/1
  • understanding check concept 0/1
  • understanding check step 0/1

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
39 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements