Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-14

← Ashish

Pedagogy reviews

good 2026-08-23 1 month ago 16/16 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

78485015 watch 78915751 watch 78875503 watch 78855481 watch 78874998 watch

satisfactory 26 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • concept explain 1/1
  • concept identify 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check concept 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
33 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-06-19 4y 3m ago 10/11 (91%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

16715542 watch 16789730 watch 16813675 watch 16780929 watch 16790002 watch 16783398 watch

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
22 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-06-14 4y 4m ago 17/19 (89%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

16564268 watch 16381956 watch 16566792 watch 16566334 watch 16568061 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 15 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
14 criteria not applicable
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • usage on visual elements