Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-14

← Sarthak Mishra

Pedagogy reviews

good 2026-09-13 1 month ago 17/17 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

79556273 watch 79575158 watch 79577492 watch 79574963 watch 79576026 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • push student 0/1

satisfactory 27 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • concept explain 1/1
  • concept identify 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution simple question 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check concept 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
31 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2026-09-11 1 month ago 17/17 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

79409869 watch 79409020 watch 79483118 watch 79482396 watch 79484427 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • push student 0/1

satisfactory 27 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • concept explain 1/1
  • concept identify 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution simple question 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check concept 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
31 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-09-04 4y 1m ago 20/22 (91%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20628954 watch 20654020 watch 20660766 watch 20677173 watch 20672308 watch 20677363 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 16 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • table setup 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
13 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-28 4y 1m ago 13/15 (87%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20333794 watch 20532230 watch 20505741 watch 20531300 watch 20523437 watch 20531025 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-23 4y 1m ago 21/23 (91%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20177652 watch 20209816 watch 20213536 watch 20218914 watch 20223423 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • paper division 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
12 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-18 4y 1m ago 22/24 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19831115 watch 19832556 watch 19889475 watch 19892480 watch 19890941 watch 19836619 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-07 4y 2m ago 17/27 (63%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19055637 watch 19339634 watch 19368537 watch 19053168 watch 18919855 watch 19186976 watch

poor 9 criteria

  • camera angle 0/1
  • closure 0/1
  • long pauses 0/2
  • paper division 0/1
  • paper quality 0/1
  • solution provided 0/1
  • step understand 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 13 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • table setup 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-07-26 4y 2m ago 22/23 (96%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

18590691 watch 18604008 watch 17699013 watch 17847668 watch 18677348 watch

satisfactory 21 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-06-21 4y 3m ago 19/24 (79%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

16717787 watch 16719341 watch 16652698 watch 16719983 watch 16652933 watch 16680976 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • paper quality 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-06-15 4y 4m ago 21/24 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

16581221 watch 16538859 watch 16628276 watch 16571701 watch 16571413 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • step understand
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-06-07 4y 4m ago 20/21 (95%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

16280801 watch 16279131 watch 16259582 watch 16265917 watch 16262365 watch 16267899 watch

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
12 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements