Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-11

← Vansh

Pedagogy reviews

good 2025-10-23 11 months ago 17/17 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

66243176 watch 66315571 watch 66317805 watch 66084758 watch 65869811 watch

satisfactory 28 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • concept explain 1/1
  • concept identify 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • push student 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution simple question 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check concept 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
31 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-07-29 4y 2m ago 27/28 (96%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

18555953 watch 18555456 watch 18877763 watch 18895825 watch 18873051 watch 18554529 watch

satisfactory 23 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • problem breakdown 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
7 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-07-19 4y 2m ago 21/24 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

18244616 watch 18215093 watch 18295586 watch 18187307 watch 18191735 watch 18245242 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements