Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-14

← Rohit Pal

Pedagogy reviews

good 2023-06-07 3y 4m ago 15/17 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

29343151 watch 29343362 watch 29332004 watch 29332057 watch 29332116 watch

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
46 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal us
  • table setup
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-05-29 3y 4m ago 13/18 (72%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

29169898 watch 29251598 watch 29256578 watch 29255118 watch 29257630 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • handwriting 0/1
  • solution provided 0/1

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
45 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • shadowing
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

good 2023-05-08 3y 5m ago 15/17 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

29009355 watch 28921664 watch 28904151 watch 28904372 watch 28888278 watch

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
46 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • student addressal us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-04-30 3y 5m ago 24/27 (89%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

28827080 watch 28874926 watch 28875053 watch 28827206 watch 28810982 watch 28827145 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
36 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution simple question
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-04-23 3y 5m ago 11/17 (65%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

28755783 watch 28712006 watch 28771008 watch 28770873 watch 28770679 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • long pauses 0/2
  • solution provided 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 7 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
46 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • shadowing
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-04-17 3y 6m ago 23/27 (85%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

28670153 watch 28680506 watch 28667629 watch 28682595 watch 28682691 watch 28683553 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • profile pic 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
36 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-04-14 3y 6m ago 24/27 (89%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

28651242 watch 28651080 watch 28651148 watch 28634218 watch 28650294 watch 28651120 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic 0/1

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
36 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-04-10 3y 6m ago 15/19 (79%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

28586631 watch 28594232 watch 28569871 watch 28577244 watch 28563944 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • profile pic 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
44 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • shadowing
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-03-30 3y 6m ago 23/27 (85%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

28433553 watch 28432948 watch 27266097 watch 28433058 watch 28433099 watch 28433274 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • profile pic 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
36 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-12-13 3y 10m ago 21/24 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

25038418 watch 25759157 watch 25043056 watch 25657733 watch 24998802 watch 25038349 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera angle 0/1
  • table setup 0/1
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-11-22 3y 10m ago 13/15 (87%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

24970652 watch 24487741 watch 24847936 watch 24957052 watch 24950096 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • profile pic
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-10-16 3y 12m ago 14/18 (78%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

23351279 watch 23355296 watch 23320571 watch 23164925 watch 23105626 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • solution provided 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
17 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-10-11 4 years ago 23/26 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

23019265 watch 22911411 watch 23018761 watch 23033351 watch 23018025 watch 23022994 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • lighting 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements