Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-18

← Shambhu Kumar Gupta

Pedagogy reviews

good 2025-11-23 10 months ago 10/10 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

67204359 watch 67316656 watch 67510211 watch 67210542 watch 67509517 watch

satisfactory 21 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • concept explain 1/1
  • concept identify 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • push student 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • solution simple question 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check concept 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
38 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2025-11-06 11 months ago 5/5 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

65905135 watch 65911215 watch 66924232 watch 66972925 watch 66922734 watch 65965679 watch

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
50 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2025-10-11 12 months ago 2/4 (50%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

65810723 watch 65721857 watch 65797288 watch 65808689 watch 65766836 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • component on whiteboard 0/1
  • greeting us 0/1
  • long pauses us 0/1

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • background noise us 1/1
  • concept explain 1/1
  • concept identify 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • understanding check concept 1/1
46 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-03-21 3y 7m ago 20/26 (77%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

28249727 watch 28248028 watch 28249830 watch 28238500 watch 28123858 watch 23855104 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • greetings 0/2
  • profile pic 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
37 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-16 4y 2m ago 24/27 (89%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19661114 watch 19651441 watch 19664134 watch 19674504 watch 19662382 watch 19652629 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • step understand 0/1

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-12 4y 2m ago 25/27 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19331956 watch 19330845 watch 19332250 watch 19331209 watch 19558704 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1

satisfactory 21 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-01 4y 2m ago 24/26 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19012663 watch 19011196 watch 18963782 watch 18962043 watch 18964132 watch 18966165 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-07-27 4y 2m ago 22/22 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

18750735 watch 18570124 watch 18750679 watch 18751141 watch 18750883 watch 18518871 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • paper quality 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • problem breakdown
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-07-21 4y 3m ago 19/24 (79%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

17334728 watch 18406846 watch 18418366 watch 18364563 watch 18404578 watch 18350009 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • paper division 0/1
  • table setup 0/1
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-06-07 4y 4m ago 12/13 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

16170048 watch 16169745 watch 16073346 watch 16169501 watch 16126722 watch 16074310 watch

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-05-29 4y 4m ago 13/14 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15559059 watch 15557855 watch 15558394 watch 15572083 watch 15558002 watch 15558586 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • step understand

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
18 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-05-19 4y 5m ago 14/16 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15325277 watch 15362907 watch 15323886 watch 15325359 watch 15433052 watch 15432795 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1

satisfactory 12 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
18 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • courteousness
  • greet energy
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-05-15 4y 5m ago 15/20 (75%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15286312 watch 15292873 watch 15296211 watch 15296607 watch 15287092 watch 15296982 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 15 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
11 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-05-11 4y 5m ago 20/24 (83%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15076947 watch 15027926 watch 15073983 watch 15128706 watch 15128368 watch 15127697 watch 15026264 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1
7 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements