Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-18

← Ramniwas

Pedagogy reviews

poor 2022-12-09 3y 10m ago 13/14 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

25534620 watch 25002651 watch 24909650 watch 25391255 watch 25258277 watch 25269515 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
21 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-09-20 4 years ago 12/15 (80%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

21775448 watch 21463688 watch 21785709 watch 21800930 watch 21727008 watch 21772128 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • paper division 0/1
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-09-13 4y 1m ago 22/25 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

21140094 watch 21237927 watch 21237130 watch 21203995 watch 21225278 watch 21229388 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • paper division 0/1
  • profile pic
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-09-06 4y 1m ago 22/24 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20743412 watch 20781363 watch 20713533 watch 20793200 watch 20743508 watch 20787377 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • paper division 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-31 4y 1m ago 22/25 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20544887 watch 20545159 watch 20693028 watch 20554857 watch 20483826 watch 20544321 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • paper division 0/1
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-25 4y 1m ago 24/26 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20312965 watch 20207516 watch 20313101 watch 20324063 watch 20347646 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-17 4y 2m ago 16/20 (80%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19800178 watch 19800273 watch 19801104 watch 19748886 watch 19493700 watch 19801835 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • greetings 0/2
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 14 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
15 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-09 4y 2m ago 20/26 (77%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19411144 watch 19443913 watch 19440412 watch 19430259 watch 19340541 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • greetings 0/2
  • paper division 0/1
  • table setup 0/1
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-02 4y 2m ago 19/27 (70%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

18339695 watch 19022311 watch 19051181 watch 18339439 watch 19013879 watch 18236688 watch

poor 6 criteria

  • camera angle 0/1
  • camera stability 0/1
  • greetings 0/2
  • paper division 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-07-15 4y 3m ago 16/22 (73%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

18069505 watch 18082743 watch 18121306 watch 18122916 watch 18127916 watch

poor 5 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • paper division 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 14 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-07-11 4y 3m ago 20/23 (87%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

16634459 watch 17872365 watch 17872728 watch 17813998 watch 17893117 watch 15618784 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • paper division 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-05-20 4y 5m ago 10/15 (67%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15485308 watch 15483460 watch 15216069 watch 15484991 watch 15485083 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • camera angle 0/1
  • camera stability 0/1
  • paper quality 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
19 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-05-11 4y 5m ago 19/24 (79%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15152250 watch 14810055 watch 15062424 watch 14999341 watch 15082513 watch 14780849 watch 15053451 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • paper division 0/1
  • paper quality 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
7 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements