Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-09

← Deeksha

Pedagogy reviews

poor 2026-09-28 11 days ago 7/8 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

80122919 watch 80252055 watch 80252387 watch 80245292 watch 79984313 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • pen 0/1

satisfactory 14 criteria

  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
44 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2026-09-14 25 days ago 8/9 (89%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

79612585 watch 79608972 watch 79608810 watch 79585605 watch 79611816 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • final solution 0/1

satisfactory 15 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • push student 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
43 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2026-09-10 29 days ago 7/8 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

79454530 watch 79426117 watch 79470458 watch 79450168 watch 79451541 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • final solution 0/1

satisfactory 13 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
45 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2026-09-06 1 month ago 6/10 (60%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

79268045 watch 79267937 watch 79243812 watch 79246079 watch 79248052 watch

poor 6 criteria

  • final solution 0/1
  • long pauses us 0/1
  • push student 0/1
  • solution simple question 0/1
  • understanding check 0/1
  • understanding check step 0/1

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
42 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-02-24 3y 7m ago 17/23 (74%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

27769329 watch 27769261 watch 27769955 watch 27767562 watch 27768548 watch 27767034 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • greetings 0/2
  • pen 0/1

satisfactory 15 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
40 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • camera angle
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-11-04 3y 11m ago 20/25 (80%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

23853337 watch 23853693 watch 23849003 watch 23869109 watch 23858362 watch 23855640 watch

poor 5 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • paper division 0/1
  • profile pic
  • table setup 0/1
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 16 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-10-28 3y 11m ago 22/27 (81%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

23827431 watch 23841253 watch 23829227 watch 23833739 watch 23836248 watch 23767284 watch

poor 5 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • profile pic
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • problem breakdown 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-07-10 4y 3m ago 10/11 (91%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

17795984 watch 17818537 watch 17821994 watch 17842945 watch 17837295 watch 17841859 watch 17837423 watch

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
22 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-07-01 4y 3m ago 10/11 (91%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

17370141 watch 17376274 watch 17377134 watch 17136376 watch 16674530 watch 17386023 watch

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • step understand
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
21 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-06-15 4y 3m ago 19/23 (83%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

16355588 watch 16626063 watch 16474432 watch 16627300 watch 16624590 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • pen 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-06-07 4y 4m ago 12/14 (86%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

16124542 watch 16125503 watch 16140387 watch 16124797 watch 16126031 watch 16128704 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
19 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • handwriting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements