Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-10

← Nihal Kumar

Pedagogy reviews

good 2026-09-30 10 days ago 7/7 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

80009415 watch 80008438 watch 79803223 watch 80326980 watch 80327242 watch

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • concept explain 1/1
  • concept identify 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check concept 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
42 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2026-09-14 26 days ago 14/15 (93%) · tutor said understood

Sessions reviewed

79554592 watch 79555070 watch 78349967 watch 79559670 watch 79590936 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • pen 0/1

satisfactory 25 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • concept explain 1/1
  • concept identify 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • push student 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution simple question 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check concept 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
33 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2025-09-07 13 months ago 8/9 (89%) · tutor said understood

Sessions reviewed

63162866 watch 62987545 watch 62987321 watch 62963860 watch 62987946 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • text alignment us 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • concept identify 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • push student 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check concept 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
40 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-05-12 4y 5m ago 22/23 (96%) · tutor said need help

Sessions reviewed

15186113 watch 15187285 watch 15174339 watch 15186741 watch 15187031 watch 15174115 watch

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-05-06 4y 5m ago 21/24 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14936726 watch 14931903 watch 14935130 watch 14930544 watch 14946063 watch 14934459 watch 14947452 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • asking to rate 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
7 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-25 4y 5m ago 21/24 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14417169 watch 14437123 watch 14411505 watch 14334777 watch 14276007 watch 14417257 watch 14335108 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • asking to rate 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
7 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-20 4y 5m ago 21/23 (91%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14170738 watch 13673410 watch 14169919 watch 13658659 watch 13795703 watch 14170592 watch 13941439 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-30 4y 6m ago 20/24 (83%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

12975250 watch 13037581 watch 13011614 watch 13204114 watch 13038973 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • solution provided 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-20 4y 6m ago 20/24 (83%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

12519888 watch 12592359 watch 12631102 watch 12592936 watch 12594087 watch 12557478 watch 12591160 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-17 4y 6m ago 20/24 (83%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

12467570 watch 12478875 watch 12470087 watch 12475741 watch 12472149 watch 12468590 watch 12476236 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • camera angle 0/1
  • session intro delay 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-12 4y 7m ago 19/22 (86%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

12235249 watch 12176592 watch 12170062 watch 12086472 watch 12221206 watch 12183476 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 15 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
  • problem establishment 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements