Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-17

← Vijay Kumar

Pedagogy reviews

poor 2023-04-03 3y 6m ago 12/15 (80%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

28069491 watch 28207026 watch 28197881 watch 28069866 watch 28484798 watch 28067449 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic 0/1

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
48 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-07-17 4y 3m ago 10/11 (91%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

18190456 watch 18192219 watch 18189847 watch 18189872 watch 17937124 watch 18190227 watch

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • step understand
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
21 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-05-16 4y 5m ago 9/10 (90%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15085096 watch 15343197 watch 15088878 watch 15067559 watch 15074333 watch 15079678 watch

satisfactory 7 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • student addressal 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
21 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-19 4y 6m ago 12/14 (86%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14198702 watch 14163370 watch 14113478 watch 14162358 watch 14158094 watch 14195370 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • closure 0/1

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
17 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-04-15 4y 6m ago 14/16 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14017270 watch 14035350 watch 13939063 watch 13919139 watch 14018826 watch 13955560 watch

satisfactory 12 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • problem establishment 2/2
16 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-11 4y 6m ago 12/15 (80%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

13846067 watch 13824750 watch 13731104 watch 13823504 watch 13753920 watch 13844867 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • handwriting 0/1

satisfactory 12 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
16 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-06 4y 6m ago 12/15 (80%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

13567884 watch 13515864 watch 13530243 watch 13573108 watch 13574185 watch 13566990 watch 13584870 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 12 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
16 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-01 4y 6m ago 19/23 (83%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

13233370 watch 13311337 watch 13282665 watch 13286843 watch 13313591 watch 13320733 watch 13312696 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • closure 0/1

satisfactory 15 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
  • problem establishment 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • physical whiteboard
  • session engagement
  • table setup
  • usage on visual elements