Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-16

← Matiurrehman

Pedagogy reviews

poor 2022-11-20 3y 11m ago 21/24 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

24862051 watch 24865020 watch 24861015 watch 24864939 watch 24885258 watch 24869573 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • paper division 0/1
  • profile pic
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • solution provided
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-11-02 3y 11m ago 22/24 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

23903684 watch 23944351 watch 23903340 watch 23945545 watch 23919016 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • paper division 0/1
  • profile pic

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-10-19 3y 12m ago 21/24 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

23510381 watch 23513328 watch 23511746 watch 23463473 watch 23510666 watch 23501167 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • paper division 0/1
  • profile pic
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-10-09 4 years ago 25/26 (96%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

22263830 watch 22700468 watch 22580576 watch 21046931 watch 22715343 watch 22698150 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 21 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-09-04 4y 1m ago 14/15 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20757710 watch 20782405 watch 20756794 watch 20783821 watch 20800065 watch 20876062 watch

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-28 4y 1m ago 21/25 (84%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20526381 watch 20519532 watch 20523573 watch 20513286 watch 20398280 watch 20534066 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • paper division 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-23 4y 1m ago 23/25 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

20230039 watch 20166003 watch 20166140 watch 20226674 watch 20205023 watch 20151351 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • paper division 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-15 4y 2m ago 23/26 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19713243 watch 19661226 watch 19711797 watch 19726174 watch 19715919 watch 19743817 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • greetings 0/2

satisfactory 21 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-08 4y 2m ago 18/24 (75%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19422395 watch 19424031 watch 19403940 watch 19376942 watch 19353304 watch 19303707 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • greetings 0/2
  • paper division 0/1
  • table setup 0/1
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 16 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-08-02 4y 2m ago 20/27 (74%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

19117425 watch 19075434 watch 19102775 watch 19096400 watch 19083261 watch 19119462 watch

poor 5 criteria

  • camera angle 0/1
  • camera stability 0/1
  • closure 0/1
  • greetings 0/2
  • paper division 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

satisfactory 2022-05-31 4y 4m ago 10/12 (83%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15729836 watch 15878404 watch 15877207 watch 15879947 watch 15873385 watch 15877523 watch 15772423 watch

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • greetings 1/2
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy
21 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-05-20 4y 5m ago 20/24 (83%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15438729 watch 15440191 watch 15438700 watch 15439595 watch 15440345 watch 15441707 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • shadowing 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • greet energy
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • step understand
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-05-13 4y 5m ago 10/13 (77%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15190405 watch 15210595 watch 15174077 watch 15189494 watch 15174039 watch 15125643 watch 15124089 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • greetings 0/2

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
18 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements