Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-09

← Vikash Kumar Thakur

Pedagogy reviews

good 2026-09-27 12 days ago 13/13 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

80150131 watch 80131230 watch 80172530 watch 80130427 watch 80152657 watch

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
41 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • text alignment
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-07-28 4y 2m ago 26/27 (96%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

18758891 watch 18672281 watch 18724848 watch 18833062 watch 18760556 watch 18027959 watch

satisfactory 22 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-07-12 4y 3m ago 20/24 (83%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

17912581 watch 14528121 watch 17296042 watch 17933334 watch 17929648 watch 17935184 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • closure 0/1
  • step understand
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-24 4y 6m ago 21/26 (81%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

12522685 watch 12523508 watch 12442939 watch 12445628 watch 12415555 watch 12523825 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • closure 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
  • problem establishment 2/2
7 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-14 4y 7m ago 18/21 (86%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

12196016 watch 12183140 watch 12364619 watch 12182743 watch 12197948 watch 12365493 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • asking to rate 0/1

satisfactory 16 criteria

  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • table setup
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-08 4y 7m ago 18/21 (86%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11866981 watch 12037183 watch 11751809 watch 12008033 watch 11734740 watch 12007035 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 16 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
11 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-02 4y 7m ago 18/23 (78%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11626934 watch 11647867 watch 11583796 watch 11633574 watch 11629954 watch 11593697 watch 11627212 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • long pauses 0/2
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 16 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements