Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-13

← Akash Kumar

Pedagogy reviews

good 2026-09-14 29 days ago 10/10 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

79620785 watch 79620586 watch 79388416 watch 79620918 watch 79600885 watch

satisfactory 16 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • solution simple question 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
43 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-09-30 4 years ago 13/14 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

22503384 watch 22499802 watch 22498740 watch 22500960 watch 22449370 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
21 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-07-07 4y 3m ago 14/15 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

17671397 watch 17670000 watch 17670897 watch 17617505 watch 17621666 watch 17668870 watch

satisfactory 13 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
17 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-07-01 4y 3m ago 11/15 (73%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

17334719 watch 17371462 watch 17337209 watch 17369639 watch 17339794 watch 17373754 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • solution provided 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • step understand

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
17 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-06-09 4y 4m ago 10/15 (67%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

16371280 watch 16371008 watch 16311259 watch 16370566 watch 16356100 watch 16369353 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • asking to rate 0/1
  • closure 0/1
  • solution provided 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
18 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-06-05 4y 4m ago 12/14 (86%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

16188710 watch 16202510 watch 16101078 watch 16182909 watch 16201888 watch 16183878 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • step understand

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
18 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-05-30 4y 4m ago 14/15 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15917835 watch 15930864 watch 15918561 watch 15932743 watch 15913087 watch 15935431 watch

satisfactory 13 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
17 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-05-26 4y 4m ago 12/15 (80%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15605335 watch 15695327 watch 15739273 watch 15738014 watch 15741024 watch 15652387 watch 15741464 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy
  • greetings 2/2
17 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-05-13 4y 5m ago 13/14 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15223709 watch 15170450 watch 15189117 watch 15223533 watch 15224463 watch 15223616 watch 15245839 watch

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
17 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-05-09 4y 5m ago 13/15 (87%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14892958 watch 14892708 watch 14832307 watch 14851705 watch 14892354 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
19 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greet energy
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-05-03 4y 5m ago 10/13 (77%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14780496 watch 14795916 watch 14749260 watch 14747589 watch 14780044 watch 14696140 watch 14747342 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
18 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-26 4y 5m ago 13/15 (87%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14425277 watch 14494557 watch 14494428 watch 14466151 watch 14470632 watch 14488419 watch 14465500 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
16 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-21 4y 5m ago 12/15 (80%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14264512 watch 14293119 watch 14292737 watch 14180610 watch 14261497 watch 14229672 watch 14222466 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 12 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
16 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-17 4y 6m ago 14/17 (82%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14052949 watch 14045841 watch 14026147 watch 14115990 watch 14046228 watch 14050380 watch 14047936 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 12 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • problem establishment 2/2
15 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-13 4y 6m ago 12/15 (80%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

13822526 watch 13916519 watch 13921931 watch 13916100 watch 13922073 watch 13938236 watch 13916204 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • session intro delay 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • solution provided 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
16 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-08 4y 6m ago 11/15 (73%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

13683356 watch 13685283 watch 13684910 watch 13460063 watch 13643556 watch 13512323 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • session intro delay 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • solution provided 1/1
16 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-03 4y 6m ago 9/14 (64%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

13434664 watch 13430358 watch 13377157 watch 13433375 watch 13433731 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • session intro delay 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • solution provided 1/1
18 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-29 4y 6m ago 11/15 (73%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

13132574 watch 13141711 watch 13105398 watch 13131441 watch 13131748 watch 13132014 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
17 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-22 4y 6m ago 18/24 (75%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

12587933 watch 12587636 watch 12753663 watch 12551719 watch 12587102 watch 12587239 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-15 4y 7m ago 20/23 (87%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

12273021 watch 12366454 watch 12460039 watch 12366955 watch 12271255 watch 12426804 watch 12399932 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • paper division 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-09 4y 7m ago 10/14 (71%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

12102080 watch 12071642 watch 11881858 watch 12070448 watch 12056386 watch 11880112 watch 12091495 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • asking to rate 0/1

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
18 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-01 4y 7m ago 21/24 (88%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11511852 watch 11546968 watch 11337681 watch 11422593 watch 11395822 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • asking to rate 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-02-23 4y 7m ago 12/19 (63%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11219184 watch 11223972 watch 11162138 watch 11097504 watch 11123738 watch 11218012 watch 11218361 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • camera angle 0/1
  • camera stability 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 12 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
13 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-02-15 4y 8m ago 17/23 (74%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

10533269 watch 10732430 watch 10658106 watch 10733167 watch 10720744 watch 10638747 watch 10729018 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1
9 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements