Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-09

← Shubham Kumar

Pedagogy reviews

poor 2026-10-05 4 days ago 13/15 (87%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

80506317 watch 80545040 watch 80523295 watch 80561098 watch 80015525 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • text alignment us 0/1

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
37 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • usage on visual elements

good 2026-09-17 22 days ago 10/10 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

79490365 watch 79505715 watch 79427470 watch 79528641 watch 79528837 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • push student 0/1

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • concept explain 1/1
  • concept identify 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • final solution 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • solution simple question 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check 1/1
  • understanding check concept 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
38 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-13 4y 6m ago 22/24 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

13754520 watch 13557252 watch 13630718 watch 12835634 watch 13756645 watch 13454332 watch 13555739 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
7 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-22 4y 6m ago 19/24 (79%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

12752338 watch 12605382 watch 12717606 watch 12476162 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-15 4y 6m ago 19/23 (83%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

12391767 watch 12394015 watch 12390767 watch 12213828 watch 12375743 watch 12383800 watch 12367474 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-08 4y 7m ago 19/23 (83%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11990331 watch 11991339 watch 11765326 watch 11991071 watch 11990811 watch 11954058 watch 11988493 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-01 4y 7m ago 16/23 (70%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11335025 watch 11582820 watch 11598777 watch 11578241 watch 11558684 watch 11578511 watch 11581286 watch

poor 5 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • closure 0/1
  • long pauses 0/2
  • solution provided 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 14 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-02-23 4y 7m ago 17/24 (71%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11023912 watch 11245969 watch 11124125 watch 11154796 watch 11222641 watch 11124556 watch 11125709 watch

poor 5 criteria

  • camera angle 0/1
  • camera stability 0/1
  • paper division 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 15 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-02-17 4y 7m ago 17/23 (74%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

10744985 watch 10833769 watch 10776637 watch 10777970 watch 10890269 watch 10687506 watch 10776983 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • camera angle 0/1
  • camera stability 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 15 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-02-04 4y 8m ago 19/19 (100%) · not acknowledged

poor 2 criteria

  • camera angle 0/1
  • camera stability 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • opens camera
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements
9 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • proficiency
  • student addressal

poor 2022-01-26 4y 8m ago 10/25 (40%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

9475514 watch 9447374 watch 9485234 watch 9484122 watch 9466810 watch 9495902 watch 9542065 watch

poor 12 criteria

  • background noise 0/1
  • camera stability 0/1
  • closure 0/1
  • fluency 0/1
  • lighting 0/1
  • long pauses 0/2
  • paper division 0/1
  • shadowing 0/1
  • solution provided 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • handwriting 1/1
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
8 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • proficiency
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements