Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-10

← Anuj Kumar Patel

Pedagogy reviews

poor 2026-10-05 5 days ago 5/6 (83%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

80551611 watch 80546278 watch 80583470 watch 80546555 watch 80583624 watch 80564592 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • greeting us 0/1

satisfactory 12 criteria

  • background noise us 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • need identification 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
46 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2026-10-02 8 days ago 12/14 (86%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

79299709 watch 79299799 watch 79303483 watch 79304578 watch 79305650 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • greeting us 0/1
  • long pauses us 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
40 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • text alignment
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-06 4y 7m ago 18/23 (78%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11647399 watch 11648157 watch 11657379 watch 11568653 watch 11597449 watch 11600752 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • paper division 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 16 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-02-28 4y 7m ago 16/23 (70%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11520845 watch 11378555 watch 11518999 watch 11519400 watch 11216324 watch 11376324 watch 11505393 watch

poor 5 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • long pauses 0/2
  • solution provided 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 14 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-02-22 4y 7m ago 13/15 (87%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11012066 watch 11075568 watch 11142057 watch 11139643 watch 11106885 watch 11109310 watch 10999296 watch

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
17 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • usage on visual elements