Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-10

← Jagdish Prasad

Pedagogy reviews

good 2026-09-29 10 days ago 14/14 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

80301287 watch 80269962 watch 29610849 watch 80304579 watch 80305996 watch

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate us 1/1
  • background noise us 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • component on whiteboard 1/1
  • confirm problem 1/1
  • greet energy us 1/1
  • greeting us 1/1
  • handwriting us 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses us 1/1
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic us 1/1
  • session intro delay us 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • student addressal us 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment us 1/1
  • understanding check step 1/1
39 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • closure
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • greet energy
  • greetings
  • handwriting
  • input devices us
  • long pauses
  • misconduct
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay
  • solution provided
  • solution simple question
  • step understand
  • student addressal
  • text alignment
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-05-09 3y 5m ago 16/19 (84%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

29020286 watch 28899505 watch 28897479 watch 28601423 watch 28560542 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 12 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
44 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • lighting
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • shadowing
  • solution simple question
  • student addressal us
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

good 2023-03-29 3y 6m ago 26/28 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

28368822 watch 28308696 watch 28353955 watch 28345690 watch 28324222 watch 28324536 watch

satisfactory 22 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
35 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution simple question
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

good 2023-03-21 3y 6m ago 26/28 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

28272132 watch 28247005 watch 28272652 watch 28273357 watch 28279946 watch

satisfactory 22 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
35 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution simple question
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-03-16 3y 6m ago 23/28 (82%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

28069584 watch 28078786 watch 28061448 watch 28199339 watch 28081377 watch 28082346 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • greetings 0/2
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 21 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
35 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution simple question
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

good 2023-03-08 3y 7m ago 26/28 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

28043435 watch 28017139 watch 28052524 watch 28045400 watch 28031071 watch 28033924 watch

satisfactory 22 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
35 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution simple question
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-03-03 3y 7m ago 23/27 (85%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

27950563 watch 27927965 watch 27924412 watch 27894412 watch 27894318 watch 27894237 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • physical whiteboard 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
36 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • closure
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution simple question
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

good 2023-02-23 3y 7m ago 26/28 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

27743547 watch 27640724 watch 27657198 watch 27736841 watch 27626147 watch 27621132 watch

satisfactory 22 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
35 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution simple question
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-02-15 3y 7m ago 26/29 (90%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

27531312 watch 27499402 watch 27519473 watch 27494041 watch 27042405 watch 27522751 watch 26946960 watch 27498571 watch 27498445 watch 27519876 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 22 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • problem breakdown 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
34 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution simple question
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

good 2023-01-24 3y 8m ago 26/28 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26917419 watch 26916327 watch 26928736 watch 26920584 watch 26900367 watch 26895182 watch

satisfactory 22 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
35 criteria not applicable
  • asking to rate us
  • background noise us
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • greet energy us
  • greeting us
  • handwriting us
  • input devices us
  • long pauses us
  • misconduct us
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • open conversations us
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • profile pic us
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • session intro delay us
  • solution simple question
  • student addressal us
  • text alignment us
  • understanding check
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-01-19 3y 8m ago 25/28 (89%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26782343 watch 26789638 watch 26784799 watch 26784050 watch 26787847 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 21 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • profile pic 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
23 criteria not applicable
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • simple question
  • solution simple question
  • step understand us
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-01-15 3y 8m ago 22/24 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26659649 watch 26658139 watch 26658570 watch 26659207 watch 26657980 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • closure 0/1
  • solution provided 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
25 criteria not applicable
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • simple question
  • solution simple question
  • step understand us
  • text alignment
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-01-12 3y 9m ago 25/26 (96%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26606921 watch 26615438 watch 26614879 watch 26621547 watch 26605880 watch 26611822 watch 26616584 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 21 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
23 criteria not applicable
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • simple question
  • solution simple question
  • step understand us
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-01-08 3y 9m ago 25/26 (96%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26501949 watch 26502719 watch 26502662 watch 26503584 watch 26501787 watch 26523306 watch 26519956 watch

poor 3 criteria

  • confirm problem 0/1
  • roadmap 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 21 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
21 criteria not applicable
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • courteousness
  • end concept understanding
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • push student
  • session engagement
  • simple question
  • step understand us
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2023-01-04 3y 9m ago 25/26 (96%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26396566 watch 26398151 watch 26407555 watch 26408424 watch 26405427 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 21 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
23 criteria not applicable
  • component on whiteboard
  • concept explain
  • concept identify
  • confirm problem
  • courteousness
  • end concept understanding
  • explain again
  • final solution
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • need identification
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • push student
  • roadmap
  • session engagement
  • simple question
  • step understand us
  • understanding check concept
  • understanding check step
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-12-22 3y 9m ago 26/26 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26057572 watch 26040813 watch 26069253 watch 26061842 watch 26062815 watch 26058303 watch

satisfactory 22 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-12-20 3y 9m ago 26/26 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

26002013 watch 25995635 watch 25970711 watch 25995698 watch 25998003 watch 25995813 watch

satisfactory 22 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-12-01 3y 10m ago 26/26 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

25348817 watch 25342044 watch 25342161 watch 25348498 watch 25324991 watch

satisfactory 22 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-11-23 3y 10m ago 26/26 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

25015325 watch 25026646 watch 24963933 watch 25026469 watch 25008039 watch 25010823 watch

satisfactory 22 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • physical whiteboard 1/1
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper quality
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-11-15 3y 10m ago 17/17 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

24602764 watch 24666202 watch 24666750 watch 24666372 watch 24646620 watch 24614235 watch

satisfactory 13 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
18 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-11-09 3y 11m ago 16/16 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

24366975 watch 24367778 watch 24364960 watch 24386626 watch 24387231 watch 24386445 watch

satisfactory 12 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
19 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-11-03 3y 11m ago 15/15 (100%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

24089193 watch 24096912 watch 24097612 watch 24089331 watch 24096172 watch 24091332 watch

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-10-27 3y 11m ago 14/15 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

23798844 watch 23791759 watch 23801871 watch 23784440 watch 23803691 watch 23776921 watch

satisfactory 11 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • profile pic
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

good 2022-10-20 3y 11m ago 14/15 (93%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

23578869 watch 23517580 watch 23573660 watch 23570848 watch 23563653 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • profile pic

satisfactory 10 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • step understand 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
20 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements