Pedagogy reviews
good 2022-08-19 4y 1m ago 12/13 (92%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
15401038 watch 14733713 watch 14801988 watch 16274623 watch 19862826 watch 14600654 watch
satisfactory 8 criteria
- asking to rate 1/1
- background noise 1/1
- fluency
- long pauses 1/2
- misconduct 1/1
- open conversations 1/2
- session intro delay 1/1
- student addressal 1/1
good 2 criteria
- greet energy 2/2
- greetings 2/2
22 criteria not applicable
- camera angle
- camera stability
- closure
- courteousness
- greenboard
- handwriting
- lighting
- motivational conversation
- opens camera
- paper division
- paper quality
- pen
- physical whiteboard
- problem breakdown
- problem establishment
- session engagement
- shadowing
- solution provided
- step understand
- table setup
- text alignment
- usage on visual elements
poor 2022-04-22 4y 5m ago 16/23 (70%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
14182093 watch 14172217 watch 14186558 watch 14312655 watch 14274693 watch
poor 6 criteria
- camera stability 0/1
- lighting 0/1
- paper division 0/1
- solution provided 0/1
- student addressal 0/1
- table setup 0/1
satisfactory 14 criteria
- asking to rate 1/1
- background noise 1/1
- camera angle 1/1
- fluency
- greenboard 1/1
- handwriting 1/1
- long pauses 1/2
- misconduct 1/1
- open conversations 1/2
- paper quality 1/1
- pen 1/1
- session intro delay 1/1
- shadowing 1/1
- text alignment 1/1
good 1 criteria
- greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
- closure
- courteousness
- motivational conversation
- opens camera
- physical whiteboard
- problem establishment
- session engagement
- usage on visual elements
poor 2022-04-18 4y 5m ago 20/23 (87%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
14022732 watch 14144304 watch 14092852 watch 14131363 watch 14111967 watch 14041529 watch 14070307 watch
poor 2 criteria
- paper division 0/1
- student addressal 0/1
satisfactory 18 criteria
- asking to rate 1/1
- background noise 1/1
- camera angle 1/1
- camera stability 1/1
- fluency
- greenboard 1/1
- handwriting 1/1
- lighting 1/1
- long pauses 1/2
- misconduct 1/1
- open conversations 1/2
- paper quality 1/1
- pen 1/1
- session intro delay 1/1
- shadowing 1/1
- solution provided 1/1
- table setup 1/1
- text alignment 1/1
good 1 criteria
- greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
- closure
- courteousness
- motivational conversation
- opens camera
- physical whiteboard
- problem establishment
- session engagement
- usage on visual elements
poor 2022-04-13 4y 6m ago 22/24 (92%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
13857042 watch 13833848 watch 13921105 watch 13837063 watch 13824647 watch 13921397 watch
poor 1 criteria
- student addressal 0/1
satisfactory 20 criteria
- asking to rate 1/1
- background noise 1/1
- camera angle 1/1
- camera stability 1/1
- closure 1/1
- fluency
- greenboard 1/1
- handwriting 1/1
- lighting 1/1
- long pauses 1/2
- misconduct 1/1
- open conversations 1/2
- paper division 1/1
- paper quality 1/1
- pen 1/1
- session intro delay 1/1
- shadowing 1/1
- solution provided 1/1
- table setup 1/1
- text alignment 1/1
good 1 criteria
- greetings 2/2
7 criteria not applicable
- courteousness
- motivational conversation
- opens camera
- physical whiteboard
- problem establishment
- session engagement
- usage on visual elements
poor 2022-04-07 4y 6m ago 19/23 (83%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
13609145 watch 13610429 watch 13611060 watch 13623031 watch 13578622 watch 13632941 watch 13530696 watch
poor 2 criteria
- session intro delay 0/1
- student addressal 0/1
satisfactory 19 criteria
- asking to rate 1/1
- background noise 1/1
- camera angle 1/1
- camera stability 1/1
- fluency
- greenboard 1/1
- greetings 1/2
- handwriting 1/1
- lighting 1/1
- long pauses 1/2
- misconduct 1/1
- open conversations 1/2
- paper division 1/1
- paper quality 1/1
- pen 1/1
- shadowing 1/1
- solution provided 1/1
- table setup 1/1
- text alignment 1/1
8 criteria not applicable
- closure
- courteousness
- motivational conversation
- opens camera
- physical whiteboard
- problem establishment
- session engagement
- usage on visual elements
poor 2022-03-31 4y 6m ago 20/23 (87%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
13228496 watch 13152065 watch 13122108 watch 13141954 watch 13093477 watch 13091546 watch
poor 1 criteria
- student addressal 0/1
satisfactory 18 criteria
- asking to rate 1/1
- background noise 1/1
- camera angle 1/1
- camera stability 1/1
- greenboard 1/1
- handwriting 1/1
- lighting 1/1
- long pauses 1/2
- misconduct 1/1
- open conversations 1/2
- paper division 1/1
- paper quality 1/1
- pen 1/1
- session intro delay 1/1
- shadowing 1/1
- solution provided 1/1
- table setup 1/1
- text alignment 1/1
good 1 criteria
- greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
- closure
- courteousness
- fluency
- motivational conversation
- opens camera
- physical whiteboard
- problem establishment
- session engagement
- usage on visual elements
poor 2022-03-22 4y 6m ago 19/22 (86%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
12338412 watch 12256152 watch 12763791 watch 12741276 watch 12431358 watch 12273743 watch 12760279 watch
poor 1 criteria
- student addressal 0/1
satisfactory 17 criteria
- asking to rate 1/1
- camera angle 1/1
- camera stability 1/1
- greenboard 1/1
- handwriting 1/1
- lighting 1/1
- long pauses 1/2
- misconduct 1/1
- open conversations 1/2
- paper division 1/1
- paper quality 1/1
- pen 1/1
- session intro delay 1/1
- shadowing 1/1
- solution provided 1/1
- table setup 1/1
- text alignment 1/1
good 1 criteria
- greetings 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
- background noise
- closure
- courteousness
- fluency
- motivational conversation
- opens camera
- physical whiteboard
- problem establishment
- session engagement
- usage on visual elements
poor 2022-03-10 4y 7m ago 18/22 (82%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
12117655 watch 12085526 watch 12164685 watch 12117870 watch 12121228 watch 12008758 watch 11934075 watch
poor 2 criteria
- camera angle 0/1
- camera stability 0/1
satisfactory 16 criteria
- asking to rate 1/1
- greenboard 1/1
- handwriting 1/1
- lighting 1/1
- long pauses 1/2
- misconduct 1/1
- open conversations 1/2
- paper division 1/1
- paper quality 1/1
- pen 1/1
- session intro delay 1/1
- shadowing 1/1
- solution provided 1/1
- student addressal 1/1
- table setup 1/1
- text alignment 1/1
good 1 criteria
- greetings 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
- background noise
- closure
- courteousness
- fluency
- motivational conversation
- opens camera
- physical whiteboard
- problem establishment
- session engagement
- usage on visual elements
poor 2022-02-27 4y 7m ago 20/23 (87%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
11359979 watch 11449644 watch 11381098 watch 11153459 watch 11448822 watch 11154228 watch
poor 1 criteria
- camera stability 0/1
satisfactory 18 criteria
- asking to rate 1/1
- camera angle 1/1
- closure 1/1
- greenboard 1/1
- handwriting 1/1
- lighting 1/1
- long pauses 1/2
- misconduct 1/1
- open conversations 1/2
- paper division 1/1
- paper quality 1/1
- pen 1/1
- session intro delay 1/1
- shadowing 1/1
- solution provided 1/1
- student addressal 1/1
- table setup 1/1
- text alignment 1/1
good 1 criteria
- greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
- background noise
- courteousness
- fluency
- motivational conversation
- opens camera
- physical whiteboard
- problem establishment
- session engagement
- usage on visual elements
poor 2022-02-21 4y 7m ago 16/22 (73%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
10918989 watch 11096113 watch 11126395 watch 11095959 watch 11122742 watch 11105264 watch
poor 4 criteria
- camera stability 0/1
- lighting 0/1
- student addressal 0/1
- table setup 0/1
satisfactory 14 criteria
- asking to rate 1/1
- camera angle 1/1
- greenboard 1/1
- handwriting 1/1
- long pauses 1/2
- misconduct 1/1
- open conversations 1/2
- paper division 1/1
- paper quality 1/1
- pen 1/1
- session intro delay 1/1
- shadowing 1/1
- solution provided 1/1
- text alignment 1/1
good 1 criteria
- greetings 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
- background noise
- closure
- courteousness
- fluency
- motivational conversation
- opens camera
- physical whiteboard
- problem establishment
- session engagement
- usage on visual elements
poor 2022-02-20 4y 7m ago 15/23 (65%) · not acknowledged
Sessions reviewed
11063941 watch 11051692 watch 11051416 watch 10918989 watch 11016617 watch 10770440 watch 11066601 watch
poor 6 criteria
- asking to rate 0/1
- camera stability 0/1
- closure 0/1
- long pauses 0/2
- student addressal 0/1
- table setup 0/1
satisfactory 13 criteria
- camera angle 1/1
- greenboard 1/1
- handwriting 1/1
- lighting 1/1
- misconduct 1/1
- open conversations 1/2
- paper division 1/1
- paper quality 1/1
- pen 1/1
- session intro delay 1/1
- shadowing 1/1
- solution provided 1/1
- text alignment 1/1
good 1 criteria
- greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
- background noise
- courteousness
- fluency
- motivational conversation
- opens camera
- physical whiteboard
- problem establishment
- session engagement
- usage on visual elements