Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-09

← RAMAN RAJPOOT

Pedagogy reviews

good 2022-08-19 4y 1m ago 12/13 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

15401038 watch 14733713 watch 14801988 watch 16274623 watch 19862826 watch 14600654 watch

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 2 criteria

  • greet energy 2/2
  • greetings 2/2
22 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • solution provided
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-22 4y 5m ago 16/23 (70%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14182093 watch 14172217 watch 14186558 watch 14312655 watch 14274693 watch

poor 6 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • lighting 0/1
  • paper division 0/1
  • solution provided 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 14 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-18 4y 5m ago 20/23 (87%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

14022732 watch 14144304 watch 14092852 watch 14131363 watch 14111967 watch 14041529 watch 14070307 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • paper division 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
8 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-13 4y 6m ago 22/24 (92%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

13857042 watch 13833848 watch 13921105 watch 13837063 watch 13824647 watch 13921397 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 20 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
7 criteria not applicable
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-04-07 4y 6m ago 19/23 (83%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

13609145 watch 13610429 watch 13611060 watch 13623031 watch 13578622 watch 13632941 watch 13530696 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • session intro delay 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 19 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1
8 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-31 4y 6m ago 20/23 (87%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

13228496 watch 13152065 watch 13122108 watch 13141954 watch 13093477 watch 13091546 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-22 4y 6m ago 19/22 (86%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

12338412 watch 12256152 watch 12763791 watch 12741276 watch 12431358 watch 12273743 watch 12760279 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 17 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • camera stability 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-03-10 4y 7m ago 18/22 (82%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

12117655 watch 12085526 watch 12164685 watch 12117870 watch 12121228 watch 12008758 watch 11934075 watch

poor 2 criteria

  • camera angle 0/1
  • camera stability 0/1

satisfactory 16 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-02-27 4y 7m ago 20/23 (87%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11359979 watch 11449644 watch 11381098 watch 11153459 watch 11448822 watch 11154228 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1

satisfactory 18 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1
  • table setup 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-02-21 4y 7m ago 16/22 (73%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

10918989 watch 11096113 watch 11126395 watch 11095959 watch 11122742 watch 11105264 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • camera stability 0/1
  • lighting 0/1
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 14 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • camera angle 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
10 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-02-20 4y 7m ago 15/23 (65%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

11063941 watch 11051692 watch 11051416 watch 10918989 watch 11016617 watch 10770440 watch 11066601 watch

poor 6 criteria

  • asking to rate 0/1
  • camera stability 0/1
  • closure 0/1
  • long pauses 0/2
  • student addressal 0/1
  • table setup 0/1

satisfactory 13 criteria

  • camera angle 1/1
  • greenboard 1/1
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • paper division 1/1
  • paper quality 1/1
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • text alignment 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greetings 2/2
9 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • usage on visual elements