Two.Sigma
Showing to 14 days · data held 2026-08-22 → 2026-10-19

← Ranjeet Kumar Singh

Pedagogy reviews

poor 2022-07-12 4y 3m ago 8/11 (73%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

17761802 watch 17711407 watch 17759208 watch 17758468 watch 17759454 watch 17231202 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • greetings 0/2

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • fluency
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy
22 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-06-20 4y 4m ago 15/20 (75%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

16782637 watch 16839658 watch 16825278 watch 16743652 watch 16808577 watch 16825595 watch

poor 4 criteria

  • camera angle 0/1
  • camera stability 0/1
  • step understand
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 15 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • greenboard 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • handwriting 1/1
  • lighting 1/1
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • pen 1/1
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • shadowing 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
  • student addressal 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy
12 criteria not applicable
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • table setup
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-06-15 4y 4m ago 9/12 (75%) · not acknowledged

Sessions reviewed

16614549 watch 16598283 watch 16485854 watch 16483321 watch 16481998 watch 16480751 watch

poor 1 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1

satisfactory 9 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • background noise 1/1
  • fluency
  • greetings 1/2
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1

good 1 criteria

  • greet energy
21 criteria not applicable
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • closure
  • courteousness
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem breakdown
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • step understand
  • table setup
  • text alignment
  • usage on visual elements

poor 2022-02-01 4y 8m ago 8/13 (62%) · not acknowledged

poor 2 criteria

  • student addressal 0/1
  • text alignment 0/1

satisfactory 8 criteria

  • asking to rate 1/1
  • closure 1/1
  • greetings 1/2
  • long pauses 1/2
  • misconduct 1/1
  • open conversations 1/2
  • session intro delay 1/1
  • solution provided 1/1
19 criteria not applicable
  • background noise
  • camera angle
  • camera stability
  • courteousness
  • fluency
  • greenboard
  • handwriting
  • lighting
  • motivational conversation
  • opens camera
  • paper division
  • paper quality
  • pen
  • physical whiteboard
  • problem establishment
  • session engagement
  • shadowing
  • table setup
  • usage on visual elements