Two.Sigma
data as of 2026-10-12 20:44 (today)

Signup pipeline everyone who created a tutor account, and how far they got · every submission →

WeekAgeSigned up Submitted KYCEver rejected VerifiedPass rate Still rejectedReached 1 session
2026-10-12 0d 300 — — — — — —
2026-10-05 7d 3504 345 9.8% 246 7.0% — — — —
2026-09-28 14d 3931 389 9.9% 351 8.9% — — — —
2026-09-21 21d 4131 457 11.1% 423 10.2% 114 2.8% 24.9% 324 7.8% 60 1.5%
2026-09-14 28d 4212 418 9.9% 381 9.0% 96 2.3% 23.0% 268 6.4% 65 1.5%
2026-09-07 35d 4278 483 11.3% 435 10.2% 114 2.7% 23.6% 288 6.7% 69 1.6%
2026-08-31 42d 4383 503 11.5% 468 10.7% 102 2.3% 20.3% 303 6.9% 67 1.5%
2026-08-24 49d 3580 317 8.9% 290 8.1% 62 1.7% 19.6% 164 4.6% 43 1.2%
2026-08-17 56d 4239 300 7.1% 261 6.2% 64 1.5% 21.3% 154 3.6% 41 1.0%
2026-08-10 63d 4147 330 8.0% 305 7.4% 64 1.5% 19.4% 179 4.3% 37 0.9%
2026-08-03 70d 3067 328 10.7% 311 10.1% 36 1.2% 11.0% 177 5.8% 23 0.7%
2026-07-27 77d 3099 299 9.6% 286 9.2% 30 1.0% 10.0% 163 5.3% 20 0.6%
2026-07-20 84d 2969 275 9.3% 265 8.9% 23 0.8% 8.4% 158 5.3% 15 0.5%
2026-07-13 91d 3498 259 7.4% 251 7.2% 22 0.6% 8.5% 148 4.2% 10 0.3%
2026-07-06 98d 2621 250 9.5% 232 8.9% 31 1.2% 12.4% 161 6.1% 17 0.6%
2026-06-29 105d 2976 262 8.8% 258 8.7% 30 1.0% 11.5% 165 5.5% 9 0.3%
2026-06-22 112d 2621 218 8.3% 207 7.9% 24 0.9% 11.0% 158 6.0% 5 0.2%
2026-06-15 119d 2258 200 8.9% 189 8.4% 21 0.9% 10.5% 153 6.8% 9 0.4%
2026-06-08 126d 2510 165 6.6% 151 6.0% 16 0.6% 9.7% 127 5.1% 4 0.2%
2026-06-01 133d 2430 173 7.1% 160 6.6% 18 0.7% 10.4% 142 5.8% 4 0.2%
2026-05-25 140d 2174 131 6.0% 120 5.5% 19 0.9% 14.5% 106 4.9% 6 0.3%
2026-05-18 147d 2811 168 6.0% 158 5.6% 20 0.7% 11.9% 135 4.8% 7 0.2%
2026-05-11 154d 2729 124 4.5% 113 4.1% 19 0.7% 15.3% 98 3.6% 3 0.1%
2026-05-04 161d 2332 142 6.1% 132 5.7% 26 1.1% 18.3% 107 4.6% 7 0.3%
2026-04-27 168d 1863 101 5.4% 93 5.0% 14 0.8% 13.9% 81 4.3% 3 0.2%
2026-04-20 175d 1823 96 5.3% 90 4.9% 9 0.5% 9.4% 75 4.1% 1 0.1%
2026-04-15 180d 1666 77 4.6% 72 4.3% 7 0.4% 9.1% 66 4.0% 2 0.1%

Measured time from signing up: submitted — half within 1d, three quarters within 5d; verified — half within 8d, three quarters within 18d · a week younger than that is left unjudged for that stage.

Tutors online vs requests by IST hour, average day over 2026-10-04 → 2026-10-11 · 6473 tutors active in 30 days · per tutor → · per sub-topic →

"Tutors online" is how many distinct tutors reported online at any point in that hour on an average day; tutor-hours in the hover. The online table is written once a night for the previous day, so it is always a day behind and cannot follow the date range — the last seven complete days are shown.

Online, available, and sent nothing tutor-hours over 2026-10-04 → 2026-10-11 · idle, zero requests pushed, and a sub-topic they teach was losing requests that hour · every tutor → · the loss this explains →

7,189 tutor-hours ≈ 899 a day 52.2% of idle time 13,774 idle of 36,266 online 930 tutors affected of 2482 ever online 12.2% median tutor across 539 with 24+ online hrs

TutorOnline hrs Sent nothing Share
Rishabh Maurya 79 79 100% vs 12.2%
Km Nandini Maurya 24 24 100% vs 12.2%
Avleen Kour 40 39 98% vs 12.2%
Aarushi 37 36 97% vs 12.2%
Nisha 36 35 97% vs 12.2%
Sakshi Mehra 106 103 97% vs 12.2%
Roshni Sherpa 26 25 96% vs 12.2%
Bhagyashree Pradhan 48 46 96% vs 12.2%
Paramjeet Kaur 89 84 94% vs 12.2%
Mahaveer 33 31 94% vs 12.2%

Ranked on share, not count — a tutor online two hundred hours collects more of everything — and only tutors with at least 24 online hours in the window appear, since below that a share says more about the sample than the tutor: the median tutor here is online one hour in the whole window. Every share is shown against the median of the tutors who clear that bar, because a percentage with nothing to compare it to is not a finding.
Read this as a lead, not a verdict. Each clause removes an innocent explanation: a tutor who was teaching was not available, one who was pushed was not skipped, and an hour with no loss in their subject had nothing to send them. The one it cannot remove is whether the tutor was accepting requests — instructor_online_window is a presence heartbeat and the replica carries no availability flag, so a tutor sitting with the app open but toggled off looks identical here to one being skipped. Measured against that: in a typical hour counted here the matcher issued about 1,035 pushes to about 125 other tutors, so these are mostly not quiet hours — but that is evidence, not proof.

Signup to submission 2026-09-30 → 2026-10-13 · by signup day · where each day's signups stand now

DayAgeSigned up Never opened KYCOpened, not submitted Profile photoID documentSub-topicsIntro videoQuestion video SubmittedIn reviewRejectedVerified
2026-10-13 0d 23 56.5% 13 39.1% 9 89%22%89%0%0% 4.3% 1 1
2026-10-12 1d 417 41.0% 171 54.4% 227 75%37%74%0%0% 4.6% 19 15 4
2026-10-11 2d 454 40.1% 182 50.2% 228 81%38%78%2%2% 9.7% 44 39 4 1
2026-10-10 3d 434 43.3% 188 46.8% 203 84%40%77%4%4% 9.9% 43 16 23 (1) 4
2026-10-09 4d 474 35.2% 167 55.7% 264 81%38%78%4%4% 9.1% 43 3 34 (2) 6
2026-10-08 5d 528 37.1% 196 53.6% 283 82%41%75%2%2% 9.3% 49 12 34 (1) 3
2026-10-07 6d 554 38.4% 213 53.2% 295 82%40%76%3%3% 8.3% 46 2 33 (3) 11
2026-10-06 7d 546 37.2% 203 52.6% 287 82%39%76%1%1% 10.3% 56 1 41 (9) 14
2026-10-05 8d 533 38.1% 203 50.5% 269 82%40%78%3%3% 11.4% 61 2 43 (9) 16
2026-10-04 9d 528 36.9% 195 51.3% 271 79%39%76%4%4% 11.7% 62 1 47 (8) 14
2026-10-03 10d 555 37.8% 210 54.8% 304 85%40%77%3%3% 7.4% 41 2 29 (3) 10
2026-10-02 11d 579 38.3% 222 51.3% 297 82%41%77%5%5% 10.4% 60 1 37 (9) 22
2026-10-01 12d 557 39.3% 219 50.4% 281 81%34%77%4%4% 10.2% 57 41 (7) 16
2026-09-30 13d 586 38.2% 224 51.7% 303 82%37%72%2%2% 10.1% 59 2 48 (5) 9

The step columns are shares of the "opened, not submitted" group only: which parts of the form they did get through. Steps are not in order — a tutor can pick sub-topics before uploading a photo. Days under 5 days old (three quarters of submissions arrive within that) are hatched and left off the chart.

Why KYC is rejected 2026-09-30 → 2026-10-13 · distinct tutors per reason per day · a rejection can carry several reasons

2,192 rejections of 1,383 tutors in the range, 182 of them rejected and blocked. Share is of tutors rejected at all.

ReasonWhat the tutor was toldTutorsShareBlocked
Question video Video solution not clear - camera not focussed on writing area 1082 78.2% 50
Question video Recorded video does not capture all the steps involved in solving the question 771 55.7% 22
Question video Solution video not clear - video is blurry or recorded in a noisy environment 452 32.7% 17
Profile photo Profile photo is not professional and with a clear background. 429 31.0% 6
Introduction video Introductory video is not clear - recorded in an environment with background noise 416 30.1% 16
Introduction video The introduction video is not appropriate. 402 29.1% 30
Introduction video Introductory video is not clear - recorded in an environment with inadequate lighting 365 26.4% 11
Question video The solution provided by you is not legible. 348 25.2% 17
Question video Video recording environment does not have sufficient lighting 310 22.4% 6
Question video The video solution is not clear. 153 11.1% 1
Introduction video Video introduction does not convey the required information. 148 10.7% 7
Max attempts — 91 6.6% 88
Max attempts Your Application does not meet the Filo standards of tutoring at this point. 91 6.6% 88
ID document The ID document uploaded by you is of a minor. 84 6.1% 78
Question video The paper used for answering the question is not acceptable. 50 3.6% 2
Question video Video solution is not audible. 42 3.0% 4
Question video The solution provided in the video is incomplete. 41 3.0%
Introduction video Voice not audible in the introduction video. 39 2.8% 1
Question video The language used in answering the question is not acceptable. 32 2.3% 16
Question video Video solution provided does not communicate the required information 32 2.3%
ID document Name on ID document does not match with profile name and introduction Video. 30 2.2% 11
Profile photo Profile photo does not clearly show your face. 26 1.9% 1
Question video The solution provided in the video is incorrect. 20 1.4% 3
ID document The ID document picture is not clear. 14 1.0% 1
Introduction video The language used in the introduction video is not acceptable. 13 0.9% 7
Introduction video The introduction video does not clearly show your face. 11 0.8%
ID document Incorrect ID document uploaded. Acceptable documents are PAN or Aadhar Card. 10 0.7% 2
Profile photo Profile photo mismatch with introduction video. 10 0.7%
Profile photo Profile photo mismatch with the ID document. 6 0.4% 2
Subtopic Not Required No requirement in the selected sub-topics 5 0.4% 2
Malicious activity Your Application does not meet the Filo standards of tutoring at this point. 2 0.1% 1
Malicious activity — 2 0.1% 1
Introduction video — 2 0.1%
Subtopic Not Required — 2 0.1% 2
NA — 2 0.1% 2
Profile photo Profile photo is not clear. 2 0.1%
No requirement in the selected sub-topics — 1 0.1%
Profile photo — 1 0.1%

Acquisition tutors completing KYC each week, and how many finished training

Activation share of each week's tutors reaching each milestone · weeks too young for a milestone are left out of that line, not plotted as zero

Cohorts newest first

WeekAgeCompleted KYC Trained 1 session5 sessions10 sessions20 sessions50 sessions
2026-10-12 0d 75 0 0% — — — — —
2026-10-05 7d 281 155 55% — — — — —
2026-09-28 14d 141 120 85% 99 70% 92 65% — — —
2026-09-21 21d 154 134 87% 116 75% 107 69% 103 67% 94 61% 62 40%
2026-09-14 28d 129 114 88% 98 76% 82 64% 77 60% 69 53% 48 37%
2026-09-07 35d 161 141 88% 126 78% 110 68% 104 65% 92 57% 77 48%
2026-08-31 42d 65 60 92% 54 83% 52 80% 50 77% 43 66% 33 51%
2026-08-24 49d 42 38 90% 34 81% 34 81% 33 79% 30 71% 24 57%
2026-08-17 56d 47 40 85% 36 77% 33 70% 33 70% 25 53% 20 43%
2026-08-10 63d 39 28 72% 25 64% 20 51% 18 46% 16 41% 15 38%
2026-08-03 70d 42 34 81% 31 74% 23 55% 23 55% 20 48% 12 29%
2026-07-27 77d 32 27 84% 16 50% 12 38% 10 31% 9 28% 7 22%
2026-07-20 84d 39 23 59% 15 38% 13 33% 13 33% 8 21% 5 13%
2026-07-13 91d 38 22 58% 10 26% 6 16% 5 13% 5 13% 4 11%
2026-07-06 98d 49 39 80% 12 24% 10 20% 9 18% 9 18% 9 18%
2026-06-29 105d 34 24 71% 10 29% 5 15% 5 15% 3 9% 3 9%
2026-06-22 112d 38 30 79% 11 29% 8 21% 7 18% 6 16% 5 13%
2026-06-15 119d 30 22 73% 10 33% 6 20% 6 20% 5 17% 5 17%
2026-06-08 126d 23 16 70% 7 30% 6 26% 5 22% 2 9% 2 9%
2026-06-01 133d 36 27 75% 8 22% 6 17% 5 14% 3 8% 3 8%
2026-05-25 140d 26 16 62% 9 35% 7 27% 5 19% 4 15% 4 15%
2026-05-18 147d 26 17 65% 6 23% 4 15% 4 15% 3 12% 3 12%
2026-05-11 154d 35 27 77% 10 29% 6 17% 5 14% 4 11% 3 9%
2026-05-04 161d 33 21 64% 8 24% 4 12% 4 12% 2 6% 2 6%
2026-04-27 168d 33 15 45% 8 24% 7 21% 7 21% 7 21% 6 18%
2026-04-20 175d 27 13 48% 9 33% 6 22% 6 22% 5 19% 3 11%
2026-04-15 180d 18 9 50% 7 39% 4 22% 3 17% 2 11% 2 11%

How long a milestone takes measured on tutors who reached it, re-measured every sync

MilestoneTutors measured Half withinThree quarters within Nine in ten within
session 1 808 6d 11d 27d
session 5 704 6d 14d 30d
session 10 653 7d 15d 31d
session 20 564 7d 15d 34d
session 50 402 11d 21d 36d

The “three quarters” column is what decides when a cohort may be judged. Note the gap between the first session and the fiftieth — the slow part is getting a tutor started, not ramping them once they are.