Two.Sigma
data as of 2026-10-08 21:48 (today)

Signup pipeline everyone who created a tutor account, and how far they got · every submission →

WeekAgeSigned up Submitted KYCEver rejected VerifiedPass rate Still rejectedReached 1 session
2026-10-05 3d 2011 — — — — — —
2026-09-28 10d 3917 368 9.4% 334 8.5% — — — —
2026-09-21 17d 4117 446 10.8% 409 9.9% 105 2.6% 23.5% 317 7.7% 47 1.1%
2026-09-14 24d 4205 412 9.8% 375 8.9% 92 2.2% 22.3% 267 6.3% 60 1.4%
2026-09-07 31d 4274 472 11.0% 421 9.9% 97 2.3% 20.6% 294 6.9% 65 1.5%
2026-08-31 38d 4364 485 11.1% 456 10.4% 93 2.1% 19.2% 297 6.8% 65 1.5%
2026-08-24 45d 3572 310 8.7% 283 7.9% 54 1.5% 17.4% 161 4.5% 43 1.2%
2026-08-17 52d 4234 296 7.0% 257 6.1% 63 1.5% 21.3% 149 3.5% 40 0.9%
2026-08-10 59d 4147 325 7.8% 300 7.2% 55 1.3% 16.9% 179 4.3% 37 0.9%
2026-08-03 66d 3065 325 10.6% 308 10.0% 34 1.1% 10.5% 171 5.6% 23 0.8%
2026-07-27 73d 3098 297 9.6% 285 9.2% 28 0.9% 9.4% 163 5.3% 19 0.6%
2026-07-20 80d 2969 274 9.2% 263 8.9% 23 0.8% 8.4% 156 5.3% 15 0.5%
2026-07-13 87d 3497 257 7.3% 250 7.1% 21 0.6% 8.2% 147 4.2% 10 0.3%
2026-07-06 94d 2618 248 9.5% 231 8.8% 31 1.2% 12.5% 161 6.1% 17 0.6%
2026-06-29 101d 2973 262 8.8% 258 8.7% 30 1.0% 11.5% 165 5.5% 8 0.3%
2026-06-22 108d 2620 218 8.3% 207 7.9% 24 0.9% 11.0% 159 6.1% 5 0.2%
2026-06-15 115d 2258 198 8.8% 188 8.3% 21 0.9% 10.6% 153 6.8% 9 0.4%
2026-06-08 122d 2510 163 6.5% 149 5.9% 16 0.6% 9.8% 126 5.0% 4 0.2%
2026-06-01 129d 2428 172 7.1% 159 6.5% 18 0.7% 10.5% 141 5.8% 4 0.2%
2026-05-25 136d 2173 131 6.0% 120 5.5% 19 0.9% 14.5% 106 4.9% 6 0.3%
2026-05-18 143d 2810 167 5.9% 157 5.6% 18 0.6% 10.8% 134 4.8% 7 0.2%
2026-05-11 150d 2729 122 4.5% 111 4.1% 18 0.7% 14.8% 98 3.6% 3 0.1%
2026-05-04 157d 2332 142 6.1% 132 5.7% 26 1.1% 18.3% 107 4.6% 7 0.3%
2026-04-27 164d 1863 101 5.4% 93 5.0% 13 0.7% 12.9% 82 4.4% 3 0.2%
2026-04-20 171d 1823 95 5.2% 90 4.9% 8 0.4% 8.4% 76 4.2% 1 0.1%
2026-04-13 178d 2331 107 4.6% 100 4.3% 11 0.5% 10.3% 91 3.9% 3 0.1%
2026-04-11 180d 621 30 4.8% 29 4.7% 1 0.2% 3.3% 27 4.3% 0 0.0%

Measured time from signing up: submitted — half within 1d, three quarters within 5d; verified — half within 7d, three quarters within 17d · a week younger than that is left unjudged for that stage.

Tutors online vs requests by IST hour, average day over 2026-09-30 → 2026-10-07 · 6628 tutors active in 30 days · per tutor → · per sub-topic →

"Tutors online" is how many distinct tutors reported online at any point in that hour on an average day; tutor-hours in the hover. The online table is written once a night for the previous day, so it is always a day behind and cannot follow the date range — the last seven complete days are shown.

Online, available, and sent nothing tutor-hours over 2026-09-30 → 2026-10-07 · idle, zero requests pushed, and a sub-topic they teach was losing requests that hour · every tutor → · the loss this explains →

6,945 tutor-hours ≈ 868 a day 52.4% of idle time 13,260 idle of 35,585 online 910 tutors affected of 2571 ever online 10.8% median tutor across 525 with 24+ online hrs

TutorOnline hrs Sent nothing Share
Jasmeet Singh 47 47 100% vs 10.8%
Rishabh Maurya 45 45 100% vs 10.8%
Yadvendra Singh 25 25 100% vs 10.8%
Sakshi Mehra 83 81 98% vs 10.8%
Sabiya Praveen 69 67 97% vs 10.8%
Avleen Kour 51 49 96% vs 10.8%
Khushi Sharma 25 24 96% vs 10.8%
Km Nandini Maurya 59 56 95% vs 10.8%
Paramjeet Kaur 99 93 94% vs 10.8%
Nisha 106 99 93% vs 10.8%

Ranked on share, not count — a tutor online two hundred hours collects more of everything — and only tutors with at least 24 online hours in the window appear, since below that a share says more about the sample than the tutor: the median tutor here is online one hour in the whole window. Every share is shown against the median of the tutors who clear that bar, because a percentage with nothing to compare it to is not a finding.
Read this as a lead, not a verdict. Each clause removes an innocent explanation: a tutor who was teaching was not available, one who was pushed was not skipped, and an hour with no loss in their subject had nothing to send them. The one it cannot remove is whether the tutor was accepting requests — instructor_online_window is a presence heartbeat and the replica carries no availability flag, so a tutor sitting with the app open but toggled off looks identical here to one being skipped. Measured against that: in a typical hour counted here the matcher issued about 1,035 pushes to about 125 other tutors, so these are mostly not quiet hours — but that is evidence, not proof.

Signup to submission 2026-09-25 → 2026-10-08 · by signup day · where each day's signups stand now

DayAgeSigned up Never opened KYCOpened, not submitted Profile photoID documentSub-topicsIntro videoQuestion video SubmittedIn reviewRejectedVerified
2026-10-08 1d 510 41.8% 213 52.2% 266 81%41%74%3%3% 6.1% 31 31
2026-10-07 2d 544 40.3% 219 53.7% 292 82%38%75%3%3% 6.1% 33 14 12 (1) 7
2026-10-06 3d 542 38.0% 206 53.7% 291 81%40%76%2%2% 8.3% 45 10 31 (5) 4
2026-10-05 4d 528 38.1% 201 52.1% 275 82%40%79%3%3% 9.8% 52 5 36 (8) 11
2026-10-04 5d 525 37.5% 197 50.7% 266 79%39%75%4%4% 11.8% 62 7 45 (8) 10
2026-10-03 6d 552 37.9% 209 55.4% 306 85%40%77%3%3% 6.7% 37 4 27 (3) 6
2026-10-02 7d 579 38.7% 224 51.8% 300 83%41%76%5%5% 9.5% 55 3 39 (8) 13
2026-10-01 8d 554 39.9% 221 50.2% 278 80%34%77%4%3% 9.9% 55 3 41 (6) 11
2026-09-30 9d 585 38.6% 226 52.0% 304 81%38%72%3%2% 9.4% 55 3 45 (4) 7
2026-09-29 10d 567 37.9% 215 52.6% 298 80%35%69%4%3% 9.5% 54 4 39 (7) 11
2026-09-28 11d 554 40.1% 222 52.7% 292 81%37%72%5%5% 7.2% 40 3 27 (6) 10
2026-09-27 12d 629 35.6% 224 53.6% 337 84%42%75%3%3% 10.8% 68 1 44 (11) 23
2026-09-26 13d 567 35.8% 203 52.4% 297 85%35%70%2%3% 11.8% 67 1 49 (7) 17
2026-09-25 14d 553 36.0% 199 53.0% 293 81%41%75%2%2% 11.0% 61 3 46 (8) 12

The step columns are shares of the "opened, not submitted" group only: which parts of the form they did get through. Steps are not in order — a tutor can pick sub-topics before uploading a photo. Days under 5 days old (three quarters of submissions arrive within that) are hatched and left off the chart.

Why KYC is rejected 2026-09-25 → 2026-10-08 · distinct tutors per reason per day · a rejection can carry several reasons

2,504 rejections of 1,502 tutors in the range, 204 of them rejected and blocked. Share is of tutors rejected at all.

ReasonWhat the tutor was toldTutorsShareBlocked
Question video Video solution not clear - camera not focussed on writing area 1240 82.6% 68
Question video Recorded video does not capture all the steps involved in solving the question 944 62.8% 31
Question video Solution video not clear - video is blurry or recorded in a noisy environment 470 31.3% 25
Profile photo Profile photo is not professional and with a clear background. 449 29.9% 12
Question video The solution provided by you is not legible. 391 26.0% 19
Introduction video Introductory video is not clear - recorded in an environment with background noise 383 25.5% 24
Question video Video recording environment does not have sufficient lighting 316 21.0% 8
Introduction video The introduction video is not appropriate. 301 20.0% 31
Introduction video Introductory video is not clear - recorded in an environment with inadequate lighting 281 18.7% 12
Introduction video Video introduction does not convey the required information. 144 9.6% 6
Question video The video solution is not clear. 139 9.3% 7
Max attempts — 112 7.5% 108
Max attempts Your Application does not meet the Filo standards of tutoring at this point. 112 7.5% 108
ID document The ID document uploaded by you is of a minor. 82 5.5% 78
Question video The paper used for answering the question is not acceptable. 58 3.9% 2
Question video The solution provided in the video is incomplete. 38 2.5%
Question video The language used in answering the question is not acceptable. 34 2.3% 20
Question video Video solution provided does not communicate the required information 33 2.2%
Introduction video Voice not audible in the introduction video. 33 2.2% 1
Question video Video solution is not audible. 30 2.0% 4
Profile photo Profile photo does not clearly show your face. 26 1.7% 2
ID document Name on ID document does not match with profile name and introduction Video. 26 1.7% 11
Question video The solution provided in the video is incorrect. 13 0.9% 4
ID document The ID document picture is not clear. 11 0.7%
Subtopic Not Required No requirement in the selected sub-topics 10 0.7% 3
Introduction video The introduction video does not clearly show your face. 10 0.7%
Profile photo Profile photo mismatch with introduction video. 9 0.6%
Introduction video The language used in the introduction video is not acceptable. 9 0.6% 4
ID document Incorrect ID document uploaded. Acceptable documents are PAN or Aadhar Card. 8 0.5% 1
Profile photo Profile photo mismatch with the ID document. 5 0.3% 1
Introduction video — 2 0.1%
Subtopic Not Required — 2 0.1% 2
NA — 2 0.1% 2
Question video — 1 0.1%
Malicious activity Your Application does not meet the Filo standards of tutoring at this point. 1 0.1%
Malicious activity — 1 0.1%
No requirement in the selected sub-topics — 1 0.1%
Profile photo — 1 0.1%
Profile photo Profile photo is not clear. 1 0.1%

Acquisition tutors completing KYC each week, and how many finished training

Activation share of each week's tutors reaching each milestone · weeks too young for a milestone are left out of that line, not plotted as zero

Cohorts newest first

WeekAgeCompleted KYC Trained 1 session5 sessions10 sessions20 sessions50 sessions
2026-10-05 3d 206 48 23% — — — — —
2026-09-28 10d 141 113 80% — — — — —
2026-09-21 17d 154 132 86% 114 74% 105 68% 100 65% 92 60% —
2026-09-14 24d 129 113 88% 98 76% 82 64% 77 60% 69 53% 46 36%
2026-09-07 31d 161 140 87% 126 78% 110 68% 104 65% 92 57% 77 48%
2026-08-31 38d 65 59 91% 54 83% 52 80% 50 77% 42 65% 32 49%
2026-08-24 45d 42 38 90% 34 81% 34 81% 33 79% 30 71% 24 57%
2026-08-17 52d 47 40 85% 36 77% 33 70% 32 68% 25 53% 19 40%
2026-08-10 59d 39 28 72% 25 64% 20 51% 18 46% 16 41% 15 38%
2026-08-03 66d 42 34 81% 31 74% 23 55% 23 55% 20 48% 12 29%
2026-07-27 73d 32 27 84% 16 50% 11 34% 10 31% 9 28% 7 22%
2026-07-20 80d 39 23 59% 15 38% 13 33% 13 33% 8 21% 5 13%
2026-07-13 87d 38 22 58% 10 26% 6 16% 5 13% 5 13% 4 11%
2026-07-06 94d 49 39 80% 12 24% 10 20% 9 18% 9 18% 9 18%
2026-06-29 101d 34 24 71% 10 29% 5 15% 5 15% 3 9% 3 9%
2026-06-22 108d 38 30 79% 11 29% 8 21% 7 18% 6 16% 5 13%
2026-06-15 115d 30 22 73% 10 33% 6 20% 6 20% 5 17% 5 17%
2026-06-08 122d 23 16 70% 7 30% 6 26% 5 22% 2 9% 2 9%
2026-06-01 129d 36 27 75% 8 22% 6 17% 5 14% 3 8% 3 8%
2026-05-25 136d 26 16 62% 9 35% 7 27% 5 19% 4 15% 4 15%
2026-05-18 143d 26 17 65% 6 23% 4 15% 4 15% 3 12% 3 12%
2026-05-11 150d 35 27 77% 10 29% 6 17% 5 14% 4 11% 3 9%
2026-05-04 157d 33 21 64% 8 24% 4 12% 4 12% 2 6% 2 6%
2026-04-27 164d 33 15 45% 8 24% 7 21% 7 21% 7 21% 6 18%
2026-04-20 171d 27 13 48% 9 33% 6 22% 6 22% 5 19% 3 11%
2026-04-13 178d 37 21 57% 13 35% 6 16% 5 14% 3 8% 3 8%
2026-04-11 180d 6 2 33% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

How long a milestone takes measured on tutors who reached it, re-measured every sync

MilestoneTutors measured Half withinThree quarters within Nine in ten within
session 1 743 6d 12d 29d
session 5 641 7d 15d 31d
session 10 597 7d 16d 33d
session 20 510 7d 17d 35d
session 50 357 11d 22d 38d

The “three quarters” column is what decides when a cohort may be judged. Note the gap between the first session and the fiftieth — the slow part is getting a tutor started, not ramping them once they are.